The World is Perfect

A Zen monk in a Japanese temple draws beautiful lines in the sand and makes a wonderful pattern. He then draws a line in the pattern, in his mind disfiguring the pattern, the reasoning behind this is his view is that nothing is perfect in this world.

 What is perfect? That is a misconstrued concept, the world is as it should be, otherwise it would not be so. Everything around us follows the basic laws of the universe, cause and effect. Things are as they should be. That there are brutal dictatorships around the world is a result of cause and effect, it is how things should be, or they would not be like that, is that not perfect? Sure we can try and change the world and make it more just and fair, if we succeed, that is how things should be, if we fail that is how things should be, but as a human one must try. That the elite in the West run the governments is how things should be, sue you can try to change things, a human being is born with the ability to act, but that is how things should be.

 That there are die hard racists in the world is a result of cause and effect, they feel by degenerating other human beings there are more spaces for whites, the effects are evil, but that is how the world should be, take action and change it, if you succeed, then you have taken the action that leads to change, that is as how the world should be, is that not a perfect world, following the laws of the universe of cause and effect. As a human take action to destroy what you do not like, but do not say it is not perfect. The world follows the laws of cause and effect perfectly, it is a perfect world.

 When you see all evidence of global warming, that is how things should be, the causes are not difficult to understand, sure that there are liars who say there is no global warming, that is perfect to, they cause more harm, the truth must fight its way, it still does not make the world imperfect, they are perfect liars, others are perfect evil, still perfect, and evil always needs an enemy, it is evil.

That blacks are downtrodden does not make the world imperfect, it is a result of cause and effect, and as humans they must take action and cause things to change for the better. Without action things will remain perfectly bad for black people. Perfectly bad is still perfect.

The universe is perfect, the world is perfect, at least with human nature we can change it, but we can not change the universe, if you are looking for neutrinos and don’t find them, there is nothing you can do about that. But evil forces of white domination can have action taken against them, because they are human affairs. Think about it, to a white man, 95% believe in a zero sum game, why should they ever admit a black can think, it is not to their benefit, if they admit that to themselves, it means they can no longer push forward the practise of robbing blacks and the African continent, it is cause and effect, hence desire to move away from them, because they simply can not tell the truth.

The world is perfect, even if we do not like what we see. Bhekuzulu Khumalo

The Universe is Perfect

I found myself on the new scientist website today, today being 18 April 2012. I found myself reading an article there entitled, “Neutrino no-show deepens cosmic ray mystery
” by Anil Ananthaswamy . I quote the first paragraph, “The failure of ghostly subatomic messengers called neutrinos to show up at an Antarctic telescope has knocked down a major astrophysical theory involving some of the most dramatic explosions in the universe.
"I would have preferred to have seen neutrinos," says the IceCube telescope's principal investigator Francis Halzen at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. "Null results are usually not very interesting, but in this case, it is."”.

It is frightening to hear people talk like this, “I would have preferred to have seen neutrinos”, is that science, obviously this person is not investigating, they already have pre conditioned results in mind. A sign of decay if at this day and age people expect to see what they want, having pre conceived ideas.

What one prefers when being a scientist leads to such silly statements as the universe is not perfect, well go and build a better universe if it is not perfect, what exists, exists because it has a function, what kind of mind then says the universe is not perfect because it is not going the way they want it to, and yet call themselves a scientist, and New Scientist prints such uttering’s, one can only wonder what is going on.

Put “Perfect Universe” in a search engine, and you find such titles as An article written in 2010 for the New York Academy of Sciences entitled “The Imperfect Universe” written in 2010 by, Marcelo Gleiser. To have such a title shows one does not comprehend the meaning of cause and effect, the universe is as it should be because of cause and effect. One can not consider themselves a scientist if they can not grasp such a simple concept, they can be considered well spoken people, debaters, but not scientists.

Go to answers in genius, and one reads in an article by Michael Oard in 1998 entitled “Missing Antimatter Challenges the ’Big Bang’ Theory”. To quote from this article, “The problem is that, so far, no antimatter domains have been detected in space within 20 megaparsecs of the Earth. This ‘ ... underscores a long-standing mystery: why the big bang displays such blatant favoritism towards matter.’1 Samuel Ting, one of the leading advocates in the search for antimatter in space, laments:”. Clearly there is something wrong when people lament results not going as they want, what is the logic behind them wanting these results, is there a proven mathematical logic behind their desires, behind their theories, or are they throwing wild suggestions to look smart because whilst at university they never had a beer, a party, never did any sport, just studied and considered themselves geniuses because all they did was study. Well if a child just studies sure they will have great marks, but certainly not a geniuses, the geniuses goes to the parties has fun and still understand the simple matter of cause and effect and does not have preconceived ideas like somebody who spent all their time reading and not thinking, reading to pass not to have the ability to think.
The universe is perfect, it is exactly the way it is supposed to be, who told you linear, was the way it is meant to be, who told you because you can’t predict it, somehow it is not perfect, there is something wrong, go and make a better universe, the way you like, then you can be happy, these pseudo scientists, study all day, never party, did no sports, think they are intelligent because they just study all day with no insight into anything, think Goldman Sachs, robbers, same thing, claiming to be more intelligent, that is how you end up blocking people who are correct, the envy will eat you up with pre conceived ideas.
Just understand cause and effect, you will humbly accept, it is perfect the universe.

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

we start again

We start again this weekend, those who enjoy enjoy, this is mainly for my thought process, I promise these next ten months will be the most exciting, as I now know here I express my pure thoughts, scientific, and facebook I express my anger. Scientific thoughts are more pure, facebook is for friends where I can be emotional, no more emotions, if you like emotions be my friend on facebook

Are There too Many Black People

Once again there is the debate being discussed about the need to reduce the African population, a debate that has been there since the beginning of colonialism. Why would one suggest that there are too many blacks as the recent program on BBC radio suggested appropriately entitled "Should Africans have fewer babies?"

One starts of life innocent and then see the reality with time, Africans place according to a doctrine that suggests there are too many blacks is to be thought for by whites, with whites saying give us resources.


The question of too many blacks does not bother China, India, Japan, Vietnam, or Brazil for instance, it bothers the western intellectuall, a question driven by fear, fear for the same reason why one can not find a chocolate bar in Canada, USA, France made in Ivory Coast. The fear seems strange from people who talk of unity of humanity, obviously with whites running the show. continue...

Equality Before the Law is a Must for Freedom

Freedom is the eternal yearning of most human beings. Over the millennia humans have fought for freedom, usually both sides claiming they are fighting for freedom. Impressive as the revolutions that changed the key political players in Tunisia and Egypt are, will the end result be freedom. Billions around the world have taken heart these dramatic changes, will the result in the long term inspire billions around the world. One should not beat about the bush, a key component of freedom is equality before the law.

Equality before the law ensures for a similar transgression of the law, the president’s son will be equally punished as the unfortunate homeless man. If the homeless man commits murder and gets a sentence of life imprisonment, the president’s son must also receive a sentence of life imprisonment for the same offense.

Equality before the law must also ensure and guarantee equal rights. Equal rights simply are what one citizen can do, another citizen can do. For example, if citizen A can open a casino, then the law must guarantee that same right to citizen B to operate a casino if they have equal rights. A casino is just a gambling establishment. One can purchase a deck of cards and find a shack and they have their own gambling establishment. You do not need tens of millions of dollars to have a gambling establishment. With enough work the shack can grow into a fancy casino, who knows, what is important is that the law is treating all citizens equally.

Another example, take banking, what is a bank? It is merely a place where one deposits money and collects it at a later date. Do you need a 50 storey skyscraper to say that is a bank, no, you need a safe and entrepreneurial spirit. Once you have laws like you need $20 million to open a bank, be sure that society does not believe in equality before the law, such a law cannot spring up where there is freedom, there is no excuse to chip away at peoples freedom, the usual excuse is to claim protection of society. In reality it is not society that is being protected but a few whose needs are be taken over the needs of the many that equality before the law ensures.

Any business is treated the same under equality before the law. If one citizen can start a particular business, in a society where there is freedom, any other citizen no matter of race, ethnicity, religion, or class can involve themselves in that business, the people will decide with who they want to do business with. A line connecting your cousin and his friend is a phone company, if you do not want to work for a phone company, use your knowledge and business acumen to start your own.

Note that manufacturing companies are not as highly regulated as say a casino or a bank, the reason being simple, elites know that it only takes a safe to start a bank, but the cost of starting a manufacturing concern usually requires huge capital up front. If the bank does not like you, usually because of race, ethnicity, or class, you will not get a loan.

Equality before the law ensures that those with qualifications, no matter where they got those qualifications can practise their profession and their customers will be satisfied or not. If qualifications are from another society, freedom will ensure that they can prove themselves quickly by writing exams similar to those written in the society. When medical doctors drive taxis, that society cannot claim to believe in freedom, it would be telling lies, that society loathes equality before the law.

If equality before the law is not guaranteed by a respected constitution, then one in the long run is inviting special interest groups to take hold of that society from both the left and the right. Those on the right having more money to fill the pockets of the politicians, those on the left sometimes able to amass enough numbers to change laws. Overtime, the system becomes clogged and special interest groups become entrenched as in the USA, corporations end up having more rights than human beings. A society that recognises the humanity of all beings believes in freedom and equality before the law.

Equality before the law recognizes that all have something to contribute to society and they must not be hindered. Humans must choose how best to contribute to society. Such a law ensures humans use what the know to survive, the right to use their knowledge and their judgement. The knowledge base will grow at a faster rate as obstacles to the mind are removed.

Egypt is an important country, the direction that 80 million people take will be judged by the world, especially the more oppressed peoples of the world, peoples in countries like Burma, Zimbabwe, Peru, Nigeria, indeed Canada, Sweden, Portugal, every corner where equality before the law is subverted for special interests will watch what happens in Egypt. 80 million free people can generate a lot of wealth if they are allowed to use whatever knowledge in their possession, an economic miracle will no doubt take place. To believe in freedom is to believe in the people, to control them is to despise them.

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

Bashar al-Assad

I remember when this man took power in Syria back in 2000, I really thought here is a new beginning, surely this man understands the world, surely Syria will now be an economic miracle, very easy to do, let the people do. He did not understand. But many times we are disappointed when people take power with great promises, remember Mswati of Swaziland, what a disgrace, Joseph Kabila of DRC.

That is why we need equality before the law, another human can not do it for you, you have to do it for yourself. You are young you have the army behind you, how difficult can it be to make sweeping reforms, give people equality and let them do, let them create. Gaddafi, Mubarak one can forgive, they come from a different time, but Mswati, Joseph Kabila, and Bashar al-Assad. How do you forgive them, they should know better.

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

Fear of Knowledge Leads to Oppression

Truly Great thinkers throughout the ages have argued for freedom, for liberty, rather than justify a ruling class, or change the way an elite behaves, they have argued for freedom, limited governments, and free exchange of ideas and goods.

The movement in this direction began in the West with the economist/ philosophers Francois Quesnay and improved upon by Adam Smith. Their works were later fully established by Ludwig von Misses and Frederick Hayek. These economists all understood that it is the free interaction of people that allows society to progress. The free interaction of people does not just include the exchange of goods and services, but the exchange of ideas, scientific knowledge, and political speech.

Two millennia before Adam Smith and Quesnay, in China there was a philosopher known as Lao Tzu, probably the first human to postulate that governments should be as small as possible, a quote from his famous works Tao Te Ching, “it is always through not meddling that the empire is won.” The Chinese only learnt recently of the truth of these words and allowed economic freedom, and just like that there is a boom. To those who feel bothered that Lao Tzu was the first to stipulate small governments, this article is for you, because you dread knowledge, thereby fearing humanity and freedom.

Central to the concept of freedom is the concept of equality before the law. Equality before the law means everybody gets equal protection from the government. In an economic sense, this means that whatever A can do, given the same resource B can do it. If B cannot do it because of the law, that means B is not receiving equal protection from the law, the law is biased towards A. For there to be fair competition in an economic, even political sense, the law cannot protect one over the other, anything else is not equality before the law. The minute one understands this they will see how unequal the law is in almost every society in the world, why is A allowed to own a casino and not B if they are equal before the law. Where there is true justice, if B fails to get a casino license and there is a law stipulating equality before the law, B should win, think about it. Governments to go around the concept of equality before the law always state they are protecting people therefore some must be more equal than others.

Central to these philosophers of the past was smaller governments, why? Governments are run by human beings, these human beings have friends, have interests, the larger the government, the larger the interests, and more friends the government will have. It is natural to help a friend. Big governments will have more interests to protect. It is best the government is small and keeps out of the way of the people, the general citizenry who are not in government and have no government protection. Friends of the government will be treated more equally than those who have no connections in government.

Having laid down the basic concept of freedom, what is it we use to create goods and services. We use knowledge to create goods and services, all human progress has come through the actions of the human mind. Knowledge shapes our modes of life as well as mode of thinking. Space is vast, but we once thought above the clouds was the home of the gods. Motion is relative, time itself moves differently in different societies, faster in undeveloped countries, hence progress seems to be slow, and slower in developed countries, hence more work is done. More work done in terms of knowledge and creating goods and services. Hence there are taboos in less developed countries that have long been found to be nonsense in developed countries. The more taboos, the less knowledge will sink in as a culture because people will be afraid of seeking out knowledge that might contradict those taboos.

Being afraid of taboos rises to oppression, and a society must make sure there are laws protecting those taboos. Hence people like the 18th century philosopher Kant argued that religion should be a private affair, the taboos in religion will hinder the progress of a society. Those who fear taboos will have to oppress people who have different views solely in order to preserve their power, yet most scriptures themselves say people are given a choice, why force the choice upon them.

Talking of taboos we can see now how oppression comes about and why the laws will not have equality, fear of knowledge. This group that fears taboos are against what they would consider chaos developing in society, they strictly want to protect their positions. This class has changed from the religious/ aristocratic link to the academic/ business link. However both use the same argument, and both fear knowledge equally for the same reason. They are what can be considered conservatives broadly speaking in a contemporary sense.

The religious/ aristocratic link said all knowledge comes from them, they have been chosen by some higher being or beings to receive knowledge and control society, thereby justifying they having more rights than the serfs, slaves who they ruled. Europe went through much bloodbath for this class to protect itself, any view different from them was written into law as heresy. Scientists were oppressed for having different views that went against the religious doctrine, as the justification for their power was the religious doctrine. Europe stagnated for over a thousand years, the dark ages.

Today’s link is the academic/ business link, these are the modern conservatives. They use academics to justify there not being competition in society, there will be chaos if more competition, there will be chaos if there is no bailout, others are genetically pre dispossessed to have knowledge as compared to others, in this university 2 + 2 = 4 is better than 2 + 2 = 4 from that university. Therefore business, the modern aristocracy uses academics, the modern priests to justify there not being competition. The modern priests fear any truth from anybody they consider an outsider, any new discovery that comes from an outsider is frowned upon, and they try to hide it and block it by any means they can. They have to do this to preserve the mantra that knowledge can only come from them; hence one can only learn from them and be chosen by them to do things. They fear equality before the law because you will not need their permission to start a casino, they will no longer be able to claim we taught him/ her. Nobody can just start their own investment advisory, they want to say we taught him/ her. Incidentally, the academics act liberal but are very much conservative as they believe all source of knowledge comes from them, bestowed upon them by going to an institution that teaches the same knowledge but the bricks and mortar at those particular institutions has special vibrations.

The conservatives, those considering themselves on the right fear knowledge because if it can come from anybody then their elite positions in society are challenged, they fear knowledge because of their greed. They will never believe in equality before the law, they believe in bailouts for themselves as they have the special talents to make money in good times, something that anybody can do by just advising people to put their money in a Dow Jones Index fund or Shanghai Composite index. The conservatives just want to make money and justify that means by using the modern priests, who if agreeing with them, shower them with money. And business returns the favour by refusing to accept knowledge can come from anybody else besides their teachers, if it comes from somebody else you just take it without acknowledging it.

The left fears knowledge for completely different reasons, the modern academic is not part of this group, they protect their interests by acting conservative, that best knowledge stems from them. The left fears knowledge because they lack confidence in themselves. They do not believe if there was equality before the law they will have anything worthwhile to contribute to society. They fear those they consider better than them, they fear that others have better knowledge than them, hence they fear to be free, and politicians take advantage of this by promising a more fair society, and the first thing they do is get rid of the concept of equality before the law, you will need special dispensation from them to use your knowledge, if you adhere to their principles, just as conservatives behave.

Fearing those with what they consider have better knowledge, the left is not driven by greed per se, but by envy, why did he discover that, that is not fair, why is he better than us, we are all the same, his work was stolen, good, that will keep him in his place why rise above the rest of us. Therefore whilst the right leaning parties use greed to fight knowledge, the left uses envy, both equally destructive emotions. At the back of the mind of so called left leaning parties is a time when we where all cave men and had no possessions and lived for 30 years, having lived brutal lives against the elements. The left envies those who allow society to progress, yet the leaders on the left themselves always have money but need to keep their people all poor, they need to keep the people in a state of lack of confidence by taking away from them the desire to be and letting state take care of it all.

Envy and greed produce an intense fear that one finds joy in the suffering of others, because to them that is justice that the mind is a worthless tool, and anybody using the mind must be feared because they are different, how comes I cannot think of that but I have a PhD from Harvard, that is just wrong and not fair, you mean I wasted my time at Harvard, anybody can gather knowledge, even on a mountain top one can discover the laws of existence, people will not pay me what the media promised I will get if knowledge exists for all who want it. But is better to get institutional education at one point, you can see human behaviour.

Do not fear knowledge, be you on the right or left. Those on the right have to stop being greedy, stop shouting you believe in equality before the law yet you never implement it. Those on the left, stop demanding for equality before the law if you fear so much that others are better than you and will progress. Both left and right should demand equality before the law rather than use it as a slogan, get rid of your greed and envy. The minute you say greed is a good thing, you will corrupt the government to serve your needs, to give you bailouts. Envy will corrupt governments to hide that others can discover new things, though both left and right have a degree of both envy and greed.

It is hoped that in Egypt, Tunisia, and in the future, Africa, well truth be, let us hope the world respects the concept of equality before the law, this will lead to a more productive world, a world were people do not fear knowledge and where it comes from, and where people will not fear new knowledge, no matter who discovered this new knowledge.

Fear of knowledge will always lead to oppression, as we move towards being one human race, to a golden age of humanity we must accept knowledge can come from anybody, and not be oppressive. What is the problem if anybody shows the world new knowledge and understanding, nobody is ordained by God or genetically to advance humanity. All humans have a duty to use their knowledge, oppressive systems and attitudes means others should not use their abilities to the full extent, that means no golden age. A golden age comes about when humans all over the world are free to be.

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

Science Fiction Tractor Beam coming up

Researchers in Hong Kong and China have successfully calculated the conditions for a tractor beam, in it infancy stage, science fiction is becoming reality.

Knowledge is built upon knowledge, I have always stated fact but it has been appreciated by the discerning mind for over 3000 years. Apparently in 2010 Australian researchers had develop a technique that was however not sufficient, In 2009 a researcher at Washington State University, Philip Marston, strangely BBC gives us his name not the names of the Chinese researchers, (That is why the rest of the world needs its own media outlets, white westerners have a different agenda from rest of humanity, to control and uplift their students never knowledge for its sake), Marston however had theorized about using sound waves, time thus far has proved theory had good results but wrong technique, but one should not be shy to be wrong, that is how knowledge base is built.

It is known that light can provide a "push", for example in solar sails that propel spacecraft on a "wind of light".
Now, in a paper on the Arxiv server, researchers from Hong Kong and China have calculated the conditions required to create a laser-based "pull".
Rather than a science fiction-style weapon, however, the approach would only work over small distances... continue to bbc site

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

Governments are involved in Progress

Obama's government will put $126 million for next generation computers. Obviously the US government believes these are important for the future of America. It is money, but not a lot, insignificant, but the point is governments are always involved no matter what the philosophy of that country is. Who ever believes Bush that less government is the way forward, just look at the record for Republicans and Democrats, obviously the bigger liars are Republicans because they always say less government, the bigger fools are those who believe the credo of Republicans when they are in opposition that they want less government, that is a fool.Anyhow it does not matter, everywhere in North America middle class being destroyed, well done money, smile India and China, a gift, the world, from American greed.

Am I for this government spending, as a knowledge economist, progress of knowledge always puts a smile on my face. Read the story at computer world.

Computerworld - WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama has included funding in his 2012 budget proposal for development of the next generation of supercomputers, an exascale system.

The money is going to the U.S. Department of Energy, which has led in developing the world's fastest computers.

If Congress approves Obama's request,...continue

A Simple Thought

The best of all rulers is but a shadowy presence to his subjects.
Next comes the ruler they love and praise;
Next comes one they fear;
Next comes one with whom they take liberties.

Lao Tzu