Refined Quantum Magnetic Experiment

 

Hypothesis: Everything is information and at the basics it all has the same basic characteristics. Everything is information and all information has these basic characteristics, everything is:

·         Discrete 

·         Independent

·         Can be categorized

·         Can be used to compute

·         Consistent

·         Result of a random event

The first law of everything states that everything is in a relationship, all relationships are maintained by energy which results in a loss of freedom and gives the relationship structure. Nothing escapes this reality. The Magnet will not be the first.

The magnet has been categorized as a magnet, it is consistent, and the result of a random event. But is the magnet discrete and therefore can be used to compute.

According to the paper the Algorithm of Information and the origin of Basic Particles, everything is made up of the same stuff. And the experiment is key to this.

Thus the experiment has 2 purposes:

1.       Show everything is made up of the same stuff, the magnet is from the same stuff as it’s source, that’s why need for a vacuum. It can not be made up of different stuff from the electrons and protons that get into a relationship. We see a similar process with creation of neutrinos in the sun, relationship between electrons and protons sometimes leads to creation of neutrinos, meaning they are from the same stuff. In this case the relationship leads to a magnet, a relationship between electrons and protons, just not enough energy to release the magnetic wave as neutrino waves are released. That is why magnetic field is always connected to it’s source. This means it is a quantum phenomenon, because no matter how much energy is used to create magnetic field it is never free from it source.

2.       The magnet follows all the rules and is discrete, the particle associated with the magnetic field is the khumson.

As we increase the vacuum strength it can only mean one thing, the magnetic phenomenon is made up of exactly the same stuff as it source.

More interesting for those who can’t grasp the importance and significance of everything being in a relationship, is the quantum phenomenon of the magnet. This we can see in the experiment above, we have an artificial magnet created, it attracts material that is potentially magnetic, for best, material that is slow to magnetize. This will give us time to see visually what’s happening with the magnetic measurement instruments. 3.

 Magnetic meters should

1                     Measure field primarily from artificial magnetic source.

2                     Measure field from potentially magnetic field as it gets magnetized.

3                     Measure field from potentially magnetic field with as little effect from artificial magnetic as possible.

We should see at

1                     Fast increase in meter as it can’t possibly measure at speed of light, but this should be the fastest of the meters to react.

2                     Given that the potentially magnetic material should take time to magnetize, 2 should show a steady increase in strength of magnetic field, not as fast as 1. This shows that magnetic field is released in packages.

3                     Should confirm ,2 a steady increase in strength of magnetic field, showing it is released in packages, confirming the khumson, confirming magnetic phenomenon is discrete. Released in packages until no matter how much energy it receives the amount of khumson will not increase unless current is increased. A quantum phenomenon.

Experiment has been refined .The measurements are in the centimetres as we can see in the diagram above. Always take good advice if you don’t know too much but theory. well obviously I will reveal who advised on saving money when experiment is done.

For Scientists

quantum tunneling, means we can study it can a distribution pattern for it, and it will apply to all other particles. On this website we once predicted what pattern this distribution will take.  The magnet is static and can hold its position for a long time allowing us to look at quantum tunneling with a steady tool. 

The behavior of the khumson will not be very different from any other basic information in terms of distribution, are the packaes equally dense, entropy, or not, a distribution that must take place after because the three meters are not likely to always read the same. A little humility before the experiment. 

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

 

If you like what you read, be generous if you can it will be appreciated

Quantum Magnetism Experiment: Everything is in a Relationship and the Khumson

Experiment refined from discussion in LinkedIn, to make it more solid and remove doubt.

Experimental evidence points out to everything being made up of the same stuff. When one is talking about everything, they are including particles, all particles are made up of the same stuff. Particles are different relationships of the same stuff. The amount and configuration of this same stuff determines the mass and characteristics of the particle.

This was explained in the paper “The Algorithm of Information and the Origin of Basic Particles”. In the sun a relationship between 2 protons because of the intense conditions we get neutrinos. That means the protons and neutrinos are made up of the same stuff. Also, there can be a relationship between protons and electrons that result in neutrinos. This means protons, electrons, and neutrinos are all made up of the same stuff. This was predicted mathematically. 

Like Charles Darwin, one looks for more evidence. One starts with the first principle that everything is in a relationship and all relationships need energy to maintain leading to a loss of freedom and structure. Particles are different relationships of the same stuff, this is clear in particle colliders like at CERN. When neutrons collide into each other a myriad of particles come out of the collision, they must all be made up of the same stuff.

What is a magnet, does it defy everything else out there in existence, it should be made up of the same stuff as the source? This is the primary reason for the experiment. However, the experiment goes further than answer is everything in a relationship, it suggests the magnet is the same as everything else, a discrete phenomenon, nothing is continuous except in pure mathematics.

The experiment has a control, the control is in the illustration below.

 

We induce a magnetic field and measure it at points A and B. We also manage the electric current that is being used to induce the magnetic field, that is why there is a current meter. This is done so we can have an accurate experiment as possible, this is merely the control experiment. The experiment must use the same amount of current to induce the magnetic field. This is so that we can learn as much as possible with least expense.

The experiment itself is identical to the control experiment except that everything happens in a vacuum using the same amount of current to induce the magnetic field. The mere presence of the magnetic field now means that the magnetic field has to be made up of the same stuff as where it emanates from. The same stuff that makes up the proton, neutrons, and electrons that encompass the material that can induce an artificial magnetic field due to a current being induced. The magnetic field is a result of the current affecting the atoms of this material to release something that can only be made of the same stuff as them, unless there is some unknown phenomenon out there.

Just like what is happening in the sun, proton to proton relationships can lead to neutrinos as well as proton electron relationships can lead to neutrinos. It is either protons, electrons and neutrinos are made up of the same stuff and in right conditions we get neutrinos, just like in right conditions we get a magnetic field when we induce an electric current. The protons, electrons, and neutrinos are made up of the same stuff unless we are willing to pretend there is some boogey thing out there we do not know. Nothing is coming from another dimension. Neutrinos and the magnetic field are not coming from other dimensions. 

The difference between the neutrino and the magnetic field is that the source of energy that creates the relationships that end up in an artificial magnetic field is not enough for the magnetic field to break free from its source. Neutrinos break of from their source. We can say any phenomenon we find that does not have enough energy to break from its source as some type of magnetic force.

The experiment is illustrated below.

The strength of the magnetic field at A and B should be equal or more than control experiment because of the lack of interference. There should be different levels of the magnetic field at A and B, different amounts of the same thing that creates the magnetic field, we will call this discrete phenomenon a khumson.

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

 

 

If you like what you read, be generous if you can it will be appreciated

Proposed experiment for Free Energy

To understand this note one must first understand concept of free energy as described in the note information and the origins of entropy, which would have been more appropriately called information and the origins of complexity.

The relationship of free energy Ḟ = (∑Ḟ_i)²/ E is just that, it helps us understand that the more complex an information package becomes the freer energy is reduced as a proportion of the total energy, the more potential energy for doing work as a proportion of total energy is reduced.

However we have tools that Einstein did not have, we have computers and we can thus experiment with simulations.

Proposed Experiment

Not sure it will work, but we try because we are human

There is a computer, it has no program it is blank. It is switched on, when on it consumes ˄_o amount of current. 1 byte of information is programmed into the computer, the computer then consumes ˄₁ amount of current.

˄₁ - ˄₀ = ▲₁

Clearly ▲1 is the amount of current required to sustain that 1 byte of information.

The second step is that 1 byte of information is programmed to move from point A to point B on the screen. When this occurs the computer consumes ˄₂ amount of current.

˄₂ - ˄₁ = ∆₁

∆1 is the free energy and ∆₁/▲₁ is proportion of free energy to total energy

Then the experiment is repeated with 2 bytes of information, then 3 bytes up to at least 100 bytes of information.

What we should find is that the proportion of free energy should be declining though total energy of the system is increasing.

The computer is best simulation that we have at the moment. If this works, then it would even be possible with thought to tackle E = MC².

Bhekuzulu Khumalo