When Mob Rules Science it becomes Racism

source: http://www.giveitlove.com

Any discipline is about facts and nothing else. A principle a theory is either correct or it is wrong nothing else should override this fact or it becomes nothing but a tool for deceit and propaganda.

Scientists in the West like to claim how they are liberal and are evidence based, in reality most are race nationalists. When the liberal New York Times mocked India with a racist cartoon in 2014 for their scientific feat of getting a probe to Mars, like somehow India shouldn’t be doing that. White scientists like their counterparts in corporate offices, police force, foreign ministries, are just as brutal in race issues and will dismiss a truth as not important. Supposedly this is fair it is ones opinion to say something is of no significance even if that opinion is based on nothing but racism. But to say something is of no significance but go ahead and teach those principles to ones children is just plain nastiness, just trying to demoralize, why? You have to ask them, nobody knows anymore.

A lot of shame of course rests on blacks who refuse to make a judgement for themselves believing in the honesty of a system that was built by subjugating blacks, a system that needs to force blacks not to think but be recipients of white thought and practice what whites think, this way whites feel good about themselves. Once principles are being taught at schools to have lied and said nobody is interested is another type of cruelty, especially from people who claim they want to promote science, it is their number one passion in life.

The cruelty of course can be summed up in an article written by Francine Uenuma from the Smithsonian about the massacre of black sharecroppers after World War 1, it is the same reasons why racism is so hardcore amongst liberal intellectuals concerning blacks in general, “Even though they served in large numbers, black soldiers “realized over the course of the war and in the immediate aftermath that their achievement and their success actually provoked more rage and more vitriol than if they had utterly failed,” says Adriane Lentz-Smith, associate professor of history at Duke University”

To understand knowledge is merely a matter of asking the right questions and following the truth. Knowledge can only be facts that we know, it can never be anything else. Translate knowledge to any language it will remain facts we know. These facts are of something, this something is information. Everything is information scientifically because everything is made up of the same stuff, and philosophically because everything can inform us of what it is. All information packages have some similar basic characteristics from the smallest particle to the largest galaxy and everything in between including human beings, lakes, solar systems, plants and parasites, it is all information. These basic characteristics are that all information is:

·         Discrete

·         Independent

·         Can be isolated

·         Can be used to compute

·         All events are random

·         Randomness is limited to certain probabilities

Knowledge is just that part of information we have been informed about. The first law of everything is that all relationships result in a loss of freedom. Philosophically one can say all relationships have a cost to them. The relationship between a slave and master might help one understand. Both the slave and the master lose freedom. The master though gains from free labor that only needs food like horses, but the master has a loss of freedom from relying on the slaves docility. The slave has lost obvious freedom they are forbidden to think and must do as told and accept guidance from master even if master is wrong.

The totality of all information is Konke. Even if there are 10 000 trillion universes, the totality of all information is Konke, Konke a Nguni word meaning everything. All the knowledge humans have is Polonke or small information from mixing of the Latin word for small polulus and the Nguni word for everything konke.

True in many crucial ways we behave as the most basic of particles. The similarities between the behaviour of an atom and a human are uncanny all having the basic characteristics laid out above as well as both following the first law of information that all relationships result in a loss of freedom.

A fair number of papers have been written by Bhekuzulu Khumalo on this topic in both economics and physics journals under the topic information. One can enjoy this video if they that was made of a presentation about information and knowledge. However when the said investigator of knowledge tried to approach the scientific worlds media, from the lowest who get 30 listeners to largest with millions of readers and thousands of listeners to spread the word the reply was always the same, nobody ever said it is wrong they just said nobody is interested in that, many in public broadcasting with tax payers money would say the same thing.

Imagine the shock to the said knowledge investigator whilst browsing the internet reading jokes to have a laugh and see’s this question being asked to a kid in a serious manner, same principles as he had been discussing over the years, the same principles establishment said nobody would be interested in, but how comes kids are being taught what was said to be garbage, not even given 5 minutes on public broadcasting.

Obviously, kids should know this, it is to their advantage to know the similarity of all things and that everything is just information. The establishment and science fraternities obviously also knew it was important, though claiming some desire to promote science to humanity on purpose the entire science establishment lied on purpose saying nobody would be interested, they where hoping that with time the waters would become murky and everything in future becomes useless debate. Just as they lied about Calculus and Newton when with strong research one realizes it was Leibnz, and before that Bhaskara, rob them whilst they are alive and give it to a friend.

The photo for this story tells it all, that kid would never be asked that question in this time period if Bhekuzulu Khumalo had not been born, but current white supremacy in science can’t accept a villager from Africa but they will take the facts and teach their children.

People need to stop telling lies just for the sake of racism and pleasure of being in a white mob in science because most of them as individuals will never really contribute anything to humanity. This same establishment will give a person editorial space and 15 minutes on public radio to tell the different smells of faeces than to a black man talking about knowledge. The establishment wants their kids to believe vital scientific principles can only come from a Cooper, Cohen, Boucher, Schmidt or Jansen at the same time they scream how much they are so different from a Nazis.

The brave teachers who are teaching the kids the truth obviously against wishes of some powerful forces need to be commended, what is truly revealing is the lies of the establishment mob how they band together even in lies, they believe nobody cares about the evidence as long as they can murky the waters. And blacks refusing to make up their own judgement deciding rather to believe that a system that for 200 years has done nothing but subjugate blacks world wide will love them, they mock the works whilst whites teach their children. The desire the same, subjugate blacks unless of course you can find yourself an Obama who will give the establishment trillions and blacks condoms, and we all know that is exactly what he did, the establishment then says he is a classy black.

As the world goes to dark times of hatred and mistrust, establishment has a huge part to play as they just want to decide who can and who can not think and the facts be damned, let us hope there are enough of us who believe all life is important, that is why the universe created life, why we have a photonic cycle.We understand randomness, we don't know where the next piece of critical information will come from, the establishment mob of course will work overtime to keep blacks down, but blacks need to believe in themselves, the white judge be it in a court of law or court of facts will see black as something to be tortured.

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

If you like what you read, be generous if you can it will be appreciated

Knowledge Economics, Drucker, Culture, Google, Race and Reason in Knowledge

Peter Drucker came of fame and popularized the word knowledge economy. He got his ideas from the likes of Schumpeter, Machlup and others including earlier management gurus like Taylor. What are these people calling knowledge economy?

They say their knowledge economy is a part of human evolution, they are a product of their times when wave theory was a wonderful tool of viewing the world and the future. These wave theories where first categorized intellectually by an economist known as Nikolai Kondratiev. He talked of stages of progress, and the stages have been standardized as agricultural/ pre-industrial, industrial revolution, steam age, mass production, oil power, and age of information and technology. Of these stages, those talking of a knowledge economy are talking of the latter stage, the age of information and technology. They are talking about an economy and the associated industries at a certain stage of human evolution. The term knowledge economics came along, and they have fudged with their definition so much that their definition of knowledge economy doesn’t even correspond with what they are considering.

Knowledge is facts that we have, that has been the definition of knowledge since time immemorial. Knowledge economics merely studies these facts we know that we have commodified, it does not look specifically at a certain stage of human development like those who talk of the knowledge economy. Knowledge economics looks at knowledge and knowledge behaves the same be it pre-industry or after this phase of human evolution.

What does knowledge economy tell us about knowledge the resource itself? The reality is it does not say much, it uses knowledge in mystical ways, because it does not need to truly understand knowledge itself because it is talking about a certain phase of human development. Knowledge economics needs to understand the resource knowledge itself, facts we know, and we know cavemen had facts that they knew, or they would not have been able to get food, it is as simple as that. That we exist means humans in the distant past, in the very beginning had facts that they know, simply to eat you need to know what to eat.

Knowledge economics shows us that knowledge is nothing more than information we know, and thus knowledge behaves exactly like all other information. Knowledge economy doesn’t care about this as it is looking at a phase of human development, like those who study the steam age. Thus, knowledge is discrete as all information is discrete, each piece of knowledge is independent this allows us to be able to learn things. Everything is information, you reading this are as much information as a galaxy, those merely studying the knowledge economy can never grasp this fact because the knowledge economy and knowledge economics are not the same thing no matter how much the crabs try and drag the other crab back into the basket.

Knowledge economics acknowledge that everything is information, it acknowledges that all disciplines can only study information, albeit different aspects of information, thus acknowledging that all disciplines are one, separated only by the aspect of information they are looking into, and the different levels of complexity of that information, only accepting everything is information can we appreciate this fact. What has the concept of knowledge economy to do with that?

Dealing with facts we know and understanding that we only no a part of the whole (this whole, all the information is konke, a Nguni word meaning everything), and knowledge economics deals with that part of everything that we know and commodify, this is economics not just economics of a phase in human development. Everything is just information because everything informs us what it is. Understanding this, knowledge economics can take advantage of the first law of information, that merely states that every relationship involves a loss of freedom, this applies to everything in existence. Knowledge economics takes advantage of this law and allows us to understand the ideological question in socio economics in another way. Quoting from the paper Knowledge Economics: Summary and Rationality, “the ideological side of economics deals with the question, there is a loss of freedom, but there is a benefit, how best do we maximize this benefit whilst minimizing the loss of freedom?” This has nothing to do with a phase in human development, this has to do with looking at facts and commodifying those facts that we know and staying in line with the universal laws of information, universal laws of information that affect the knowledge economy but also pre-industrial society a depth that those studying the knowledge economy do not have to deal with.

As knowledge economics deals with commodified information it cannot escape the reality of the algorithm of information and thus understands the pervasive influence of probability on all information, thus affecting our view of rationality. An action can not be known to be rational except in the future, and all information in existence is restricted in the choices available to it. Even in the freest society there is a limited amount of candy you can choose to buy, the most basic of particles has limited choices, it can not be everywhere, the hydrogen particles in the sun are not here and there at the same time. The wildebeest has limited choices for drinking water.

Tyrants have always wanted to control flow of knowledge, the Popes wanted all knowledge to seem to come from them, thus Galileo’s predicament, colonisers want it to seem that all knowledge comes from them. To control this, they always make it irrational to chase after knowledge if you are not one of them, just as a slave master threatens death if a slave escapes to make it more likely to be irrational to try to escape. The powers that be have determined the world needs not know what a black think, he must merely get answers to the bigger questions of existence from others. It has been made irrational to pursue knowledge, Google, claiming that net neutrality means control of the internet want to control it themselves.

Type knowledge economics and google will always direct you to knowledge economy, even though the two are completely different, the idea is to control black thought, hide it, what right does a black man have to show the existence of laws of information, algorithm of information, stick to what whites have to say about knowledge and economics, no matter how shallow that discipline is. We have to accept this reality, and tell the truth to ourselves no matter what they say the owners of google and other tech companies are out to promote their own, not truth as such, that is why liberty is important, it goes back to that question knowledge economics raises, “how best do we maximize this benefit whilst minimizing the loss of freedom” With liberty the black man will have a way to create their own search engines, encyclopedias on the net, social sites, Artificial Intelligence, mine our own resources, without liberty Blacks are open to the same old lies and being swindled materially, artistically and intellectually, actions always speak loudest, type knowledge economics on google, obviously acting in behest of a larger group otherwise why would google be acting as it does. Anybody who believes in freedom will never behave like this strange  entitled cabal fighting knowledge.

@bhekukhumalo