Science is the Mindset

When one wants to do science, doing science can be learning or being an active participant as a professional or science investigator, their mind must be attuned to science. It does not matter what branch of science one is dealing with, be it social sciences or the natural sciences.

The basis of human existence is a scientific mind. Without a scientific mind there would not be a single human being on this planet. If one goes deep enough one can say every living thing, by the mere fact that it is alive is capable for a scientific mind up to its intellectual capabilities. This is far from an absurd statement, in 2022 it was shown that fungus communicate with each other, they have the equivalent of at least 50 words.

To be alive, let us stick to human beings, to be alive means one automatically accepted that there are certain things where they must be honest to themselves and accept the evidence in front of them. They need energy to survive and to be able to do things, be they liars after the fact of accepting the reality that they must accept that fact of needing energy.

We know from the first of law of information that everything is in a relationship and all relationships lead to a loss of freedom due to the costs involved, all these costs are in terms of energy required to maintain those relationships. Without energy an information package can not have the most basic relationship, that of maintaining itself as that type of information package.

That one accepts this truth to survive, that is why they eat food, means that the minds of all human beings, of all life understands the concept of accepting the truth, or they will cease to exist if they deny that basic truth. That is all science is, accepting the truth in front of you.

The first thing a scientific mind has to do is to accept the truth, accept facts. Some facts are just harder to get to than one needs food to sustain themselves as firstly living but accepting the truth that one needs to accept the truth for survival, the acquiring of energy means every single human being if they want to can accept facts.

Many great philosophers have said that it is important to be truthful to oneself. To be truthful to oneself means that one does not change the facts to suite what they want, because then those are no longer facts. I read this one great quote on Gab. Gab is a social media site where people can go there and speak whatever they like if they have the stomach to take other peoples opinions. Now this @eschatologuy commented “when an honest man realizes he is mistaken, he will either cease to be honest or cease to be mistaken.”

Take the social sciences, let us take economics for example. One must first ask themselves what it is that they are looking into, what is economics. Economics is the study of how humans use knowledge to identify resources and use these scarce resources to create, using knowledge, commodities and distribute them among people.

It is a human being that identifies a resource given the knowledge base of that society, having identified that resource it is a human being that turns that resource into a commodity, a commodity in economics is everything that is in the market that is not a service. A television is as much a commodity as a shoe or sugar and gold. The human mind must identify the resource, oil has been in the ground for millions of years, but 1 000 years ago there was not enough knowledge to turn crude oil into a commodity. As humans advance, oil might seize to be an important commodity in the future as other resources have been identified that can do the job better.

One can see that there are rich countries, middle income countries and poor countries. One must look at statistics and accept this fact, the first step in a scientific mind is to accept this reality. Why are there rich, middle-, and low-income countries. One must be realistic to themselves, to be realistic to themselves they must first admit that economics no matter the fancy definitions can come down to a simple matter, this simple matter is need for humans to have food, so economics comes down to how do humans feed themselves, how do humans get food to have relationships.

Thus, the question of why some countries have different income levels is solely an economic question, it comes down to how humans are allowed to feed themselves. Thus, the difference between rich, middle- and low-income countries is only about how people are allowed to feed themselves. Who gets to get the choicest meat, even wild animals, know those involved in the hunt get the choicest meat? Once the choicest piece of meat goes to those not involved in the hunt there will not be incentive to hunt with that group.

When one has to pay government officials for the most useless things to be involved in production, that will disincentivize people. Of course, this technique can be used to disincentivize a group or an individual. Once government gives one’s mind away, it is to disincentivize that person from thinking, even though they did all the hunting. It is evil and not natural.

Now an honest economist will accept this reality that how economics works is how a society is organized, but an economist knowing this truth and says other things has ceased to be honest and we will get the situation we see in much of Africa, former Soviet countries, South America (it is only called Latin America because it was conquered by the Spanish and Portuguese. I mean when one says that Ukraine was a country of virtue before this war when it was easily one of the most corrupt countries on this planet. Those saying that have ceased to be honest. That is not a justification of anything, just a statement of fact.

One can see the situation in Africa, everybody knows how to accept facts, when an entire society is vested in denying facts, it mostly does not matter if a corrupt government is replaced by the opposition, the opposition was waiting for its time to get the choicest pieces of meat, one see’s this in South America too. When it benefits a group to rob another group, it does not matter who is in power that group will be robbed, this happens all over the world. If people pretend, they can not see this, humanity has decided to be dishonest in general.

Truth is not food where if one has enough income, they can have different flavors of truth. The truth is not up to one’s taste, especially when it comes to organizing a successful thriving society. Truth is up to one’s taste for a toddler mind who is allowed to lack discipline as they lie their way out of problems, but the problems never go away. The problems do not go away because one is refusing to look at evidence and facts.

For thousands of years humans have looked up to mystics according to myth, always according to myth, could move objects with their minds, very powerful wizards. These mythological people are in modern entertainment, people so in-tune with nature by mere thought they can create lightening, rain, move rocks, you see these fantastic beings in every culture, going through vast mind training it is on television and the movies.

Project Star Gate that started in 1972 by the CIA was as a response to what was believed was KGB experiments into extra sensory perception (ESP) and psychoanalysis, moving matter with one’s minds, affecting matter with one’s mind. You go Jedi. This idea of this super humans has been persistent through out history.

Take a laser. Get a cardboard box even a McDonalds Happy meal box, put two slices 0.5 cm apart, from a meter or a little further shine a laser through the slits, you will see a wave formation at the back. Note, you personally doing the experiment will see the wave formation with your eyes. You are observing the web formation.

Now do the same experiment in a laboratory. You will get the same thing; you will see the wave formation. In the laboratory one can place detectors to try and verify which slit a photon is going through. When we interfere and try to do this, we no longer get a wave formation, we see two lines, two dots, that wave now behaves like a particle, that is why the wave/ particle duality.

Now those of pseudo science will claim it is the human mind that is changing the behaviour of light. When we look they will say it is a particle, and when we look away it is a wave. They do not care about the absurdity, because we see it is a wave, but longing for those superhuman abilities of distant mythological times and with the ever expanding woke age, not understanding all the yoga in the world will not allow your mind to lift a rock. To such people evidence does not matter.

The reason why evidence does not matter is the mythological longing in their minds, if we can merely affect unanimated matter at the fundamental level, it means with more clarity we can move rocks with our minds. Of course, it is absurd, but there was project star gate from the CIA, you think you can reason with such a mind, any reason for war, project star gate tells us that. It doesn’t have to be real the accusations; the war is needed.  

Can you imagine seeing a wave with your eyes then at the same time saying when you don’t look there is no wave. How does one know it is a wave when they don’t look, it is about interactions, and relationships when we attempt to measure?

Magnetic tests that have been done say at the poles magnetism comes out as a wave. However, when you interfere, it always organizes into a wave, but evidence does not matter to those who have ceased to be honest and desire politics and suggestions of just crazy longings from reading stories of sticks turning into snakes, affecting unanimated stuff means we all have the potential to turn water into wine with enough clarity. Affect the air to uplift, throw lightening, entertaining stuff, awe inspiring to the ancient.

Let us take the first law of everything. Everything is in a relationship and all relationships result in a loss of freedom due to the energy needed for a relationship. Knowing where it comes from is important, if one says it has its roots in the ideas of Einstein, one has ceased to be an honest scientist, they are playing hoaxes for their desires, they wish, even if your friends own the entire world and all the media, it is still just a wish.

But one is distorting knowledge lines, to trace the thought for their own dishonest hidden ways, those that do not mind are part of that group that is dishonest as theoretical scientists, attributing knowledge to where it does not belong.

Wheeler would be more correct to say he had enough influence in getting to the theory because his definition of information was the same as my understanding of knowledge, you can only know what is discrete. Writing this series of podcasts, Nikolai Tesla understood the big concepts far more as he understood it is about energy, frequency and vibrations just different levels of energy. One hopes those string theory people are honest and say they where inspired by Tesla, but for politics, probably will not mention that.

However, Tesla understood more than Einstein for the time that it is all about energy, just didn’t realize that energy is about maintaining a relationship. The resultant relationship one can say will have a certain frequency so to say. Absolutely staggering mind, mostly logic, not too much maths, his own experiments so long ago, yes a staggering feat given the time. I am thoroughly convinced for example, yet to be proven that because of 4 main agents in genetics that take different order, the different combinations result merely in different frequencies because of the different relationships produced by different combinations.

Pythagoras understood in a more basic manner this idea of energy, frequency and vibrations. Pythagoras existed in ancient Greece, he lived 500 years before Jesus and our calendar years for business are based on how many years since the birth of Jesus. Pythagoras believed that each celestial body, planets and the stars had their own unique musical note based on how they moved through the universe. Pythagoras knew a bit about music in mathematical terms. He understood mathematically why different string lengths had different musical note. Music is frequency and vibrations, frequency and vibrations are about energy. I must profess ignorance here, it would be proper to know if other philosophers rom ancient past civilizations perhaps China, India, Japan, Aztecs, maybe Africa also understood th world in terms of energy frequency and vibrations, was it just Pythagoras in his time, before Christ or 500 years after birth of Christ.

4 main agents in genetics, plus a lot of other stuff, the combinations must result in different energy qualities, energy, frequency and vibrations. This lends credence to the idea that everything is made up of the same thing, the difference being the frequency and the frequency being a result of the differences in the relationship, the frequency signalling the different costs of the relationship, perhaps.

But if everything is made up of the same stuff and just about different relationship, then basic particles of the standard model in physics are all made up of the same stuff and it is just relationships between this same stuff that gives rise to particles.

We know there is finer stuff than particles because magnetism always organizes into a wave formation after interference, mind you, the blank experiment with no interference, from the pole, magnetism is always a wave, it is the interference when it must organize into a wave. It organizes all the time. This means it is going through some medium, why organize into a wave yet without interference it comes out from the poles as a wave. It is this other medium that will give us clues as to what all particles are made of.

The tobacco industry had scientists claiming that tobacco is harmless, those where very dishonest scientists, that is how they fed themselves.

Those pretending they are the smartest and give scientific proof are guaranteed hoaxes, but humans fall for it, that is why Africa in general believes some outside force will develop the continent for them, that is why the continued repression in large part, the people can not develop themselves. It is a big money spinner to be a scientific hoax for your group, that ensures your group will be regarded as smartest and given what they please in detriment to the locals, we will develop you, such nonsense.

People develop themselves if they are allowed, then they can blame hunger on themselves not the government, it is always the government if you are hungry and not allowed to do. 

If you like what you read, be generous if you can it will be appreciated

Facing Trauma and Relationships in Society

The podcast can be found: Facing Trauma and Relationship in Society

Whatever you hear today you can not act on it on impulse, take 12 months from today, really take your time and reason. Who is the evil guy the government or the opposition, seemingly they are the same wanting people to jump and never relax.

One can never face what they deny existing. One must first accept that there is trauma and it affects them, if one does not accept trauma then there is nothing they can ever do about it except to follow its ways obediently believing that is normal. One needs to accept what their senses are telling them or observe what their senses are telling them more carefully. If one denies their own senses, then not much can be done.

But rarely will one deny their senses, people will rather justify the falsification of what they sense to satisfy other needs that would be difficult to achieve if they could not justify falsification of the evidence from their senses. This is normally around food, shelter, and clothing.

The senses pick up all the reality outside a human being’s body. It is these senses that allow one to interpret the relationships around them. No matter how much culture says that such and such a group can not do a task, if you see them doing the said task, by the mere fact that you have witnessed it your senses have picked it up and will affect the relationships in your mind. In all cases one can never deny what they senses have registered, but one has two choices. They can act according to that information and change or they can for the sake of culture not act according to the information their own senses have picked up. 

When one decides to ignore the information that their own senses have picked for food, shelter, and clothing, they have accepted what kind of character they are. Knowing the truth, they must deter the reality from taking full effect. They for the ease of food, shelter, and clothing must create a culture built on mysticism, away from reality, for there is no other way to deny one’s own senses.

Humans now know that everything is in a relationship. This is not a mystical concept like that talked of around the Chi of Taoist traditions, the Prana of Indian mystics, the Spirit of the Sharman, Christianity, the god that is everywhere, the philosophies of Leibnitz, Plato, and the such, humans understand the scientific principles behind everything is in a relationship and it starts with material before the big bang. All relationships need energy to maintain that is what gives it a structure. Structure allows us to categorize for example a photon differently from an electron even though both are made up of the same stuff, only amount of mass differentiating their properties.  The mass of the photon and electron is kept in place by a relationship. When we understand fully this relationship science can say to have taken a massive leap forward, it will mean theoretically we have the ability to create a particle.

Just like aa particle, human relationships have structure, that is why it is said society has structure. These relationships are maintained by energy. The structure of society depends on the culture of that society, what is it the society values as a whole, what the collective has agreed to by persuasion and coercion. Cultures evolve, they must evolve to their surroundings, that is just reality. Cultures evolve to changing relationships.

Changing relationships are picked up by the senses. The senses can pick up the threat from a gun pointing at them and a reward of cash in an envelope in front of them. These are relationship the mind understands, the same way a mind understands that all relationships are random. How they react to this truth depends on how it affects their food, shelter, and clothing.

One must accept the truth first, that the society does not accept that all relationships are random, that a human is just a human. Then one must accept that society rejecting everything is random affects how they can get food, shelter, and clothing. Given that somebody knows that culture of the society, the relationships in society prevent one from getting food, shelter, and clothing in a manner they feel they should be able to.

If one accepts the culture that they should be barred from using their full humanity to get food, shelter, and clothing, then they accept the culture. It is therefore not enough to be blocked from pursuing certain disciplines, this is done in many ways, at the end one can just take somebody’s mind from what culture has deemed as the lower, claim it as theirs and the entire culture that benefits from that will approve. When a slave master claims the mind of a slave, all slave owners must agree or the deviation from the reality that everything is in a relationship and that all these relationships are random will be proven to be just for cultural benefit for food, shelter, and clothing, and is not based on mind but mystical phenomenon of the moment. Mystical phenomenon though always around is for the moment, always changing, that all relationships are random can never change at the whims of justifying how one gets food, shelter and clothing, it does not depend on demanding one to be faithful to it but to observe reality which they can do themselves if they choose.

Mystical stuff is forbidden to a few who be mystical means can interpret it, thus culturally saying in regards to whatever is being mystified, only a certain people have access to understanding it and they shall interpret the messages for the rest of society or humanity. It is all mystical the defences of trauma in regard to deny that all relationships for safeguarding ones source of food, shelter, and clothing. One capable knows when they are being denied, trauma is there to warn them they have crossed some mystical line. Trauma often will not be applied just for the sake of it, one knows the reason, they are cultural norms, and trauma often is used to enforce those cultural lines.

When one is denied a promotion even though they know they are more capable, that is enforcing trauma, to enforce the idea that it is more mystical than ability in a society that is supposed to be together for everybody’s good. It registers in the mind that something beyond ability is wrong with them according to relationships within the society.

The better software engineer who doesn’t get financing, they know it is not their abilities that where the let down as they watch their inferiors in terms of the discipline turned into myths. They will always know it is about mystical relationships not reality.

The accountant with all the top qualifications in their field who cries themselves to sleep as they watch somebody with a diploma promoted above them. All these people have a choice, to deny reality and conform to the culture of trauma, and say why must I deny reality for caviar, continuing a cycle of trauma.

The soldier who is not promoted knowing what they have done compared to the one who is promoted. They know, it is about mystical relationships in society that deny that all relationships are random, ultimately denying the ability of human beings for mystical reasons. However, there is another side to this scenario. For a soldier to be promoted means another was promoted. If the soldier who was not promoted understands that it was not about ability but other reasons, the soldier who was promoted knows they are being promoted  for other reasons than ability but because of office, the rest are obliged to follow.

The soldier promoted understands that the system benefits them. They accept society is not unitary but divided for their benefit in terms that go beyond ability. This mysticism is around food, shelter and clothing. The soldier not promoted also understands that it is about mysticism around food, shelter, and clothing, but the mysticism does not benefit them. To get ahead the soldier not promoted must prove other abilities above ability that the higher up demand because of relationships in society.

The merchant who is not allowed to sell their wares, there is only one possibility, they do not belong to society as much as the merchant who can sell their wares. They must find another role that cultural relationships in society will allow, but selling their wares is not their cultural role and the food, shelter, and clothing that come with a merchant who sells those wares. Those who justify such trauma are benefiting from it or hope to benefit from it by adopting to it. 

The journalist who is not allowed to tell the truth, they either adapt to the culture or find other ways to tell the truth. That journalist knows they are not allowed to tell the truth, the relationships established by information from the world outside their body inform them to tell the truth will lead to, because of relationships in their society, to a threat to their food, shelter, and clothing. If that journalist can not tell the truth, that means all the journalists are not allowed to tell the truth, all around food, shelter, and clothing.

A top expert not invited to the discussion, they know why they are not invited to give their input in the discussion, they know it is not about ability but some mystical construct in society around what type of person can be seen to have a reasonable opinion on a subject matter even if their contributions are not as significant. This all has to do with food, shelter, and clothing.

Those who the trauma is targeted against are aware of this trauma, they understand the relationships in society, there are lines they must not culturally cross, their senses will be made aware when they cross these lines. If those the trauma is targeted against acknowledge that this culture is bad for them that is the first step in attempting to confront these lopsided relationships in society when it comes to food, shelter, and clothing. 

Those accepting that the relationships are skewed in society to favor some of other, that society does not accept all as human, even if they do, they do not accept as equal humans or they believe that just be being some deserve protection culturally over others. Over generations of course these is detrimental. For example if society has culturally established that certain segments of society are to receive government aide, after 2 to 3 generations their competition will have been reduced, not because of lack of skills but because of lack of cultural protection that is implied by government assistance.

Accepting that relationships are random and society should be organized in a such manner to show this reality, organized in the ideal that society is one whole and that for the whole to benefit randomness must be a key reality in the acquiring of food, shelter, and clothing. Society is not maximizing the knowledge output, but this might be secondary to keeping another group down in that society. What is one supposed to do given such a culture that hinders them from participating at full a potential as they possibly can?

When one is harassed by the security forces statistically more than others who do not have certain characteristics associated with them by culture , culture of trauma that rejects that relationships are random, thus a human is a human is the conclusion given the classification of a human being. They must weigh what type of relationships they value, choosing the mystical routes, they themselves, not the public will know it was all mysticism, supporting what is considered and the relationships that exist are easier way for one to acquire food, shelter, and clothing.

Or, one can choose to accept the reality that their senses are picking up and demand more just relationships in society. Or at the least desire a change in their mind. They can desire this change to become the mystic, replacing mysticism with their own mysticism, or they can desire to get rid of what is traumatizing them and accept that all relationships are random and get rid of the mysticism except that calls all if such a truth can be considered mysticism. The problem has been mysticism replaced by mysticism always promising better than the last mystics.

When performance is not a criterion for reward of any sort, then food, shelter, and clothing in society are distributed by mystical means. As it is the culture that performance is not the major criteria for reward, performance itself will not help. The relationships in society are based on a culture whereby performance is not necessarily the criteria for reward. Performance will therefore have little effect on the culture, everybody is already aware of that and have accepted it in action.

If the relationships in ones mind strongly lean towards action, one will find a way to air their grievances, they could try the justice system. The justice system upholds the ideals of the culture of the land as set by the laws of the land. One could try to appeal that they are human beings, with same abilities, potential, but the justice system is culture of the land. If the culture is against all relationships are random then the justice system will fail to give one those rights. Laws are set for the rulers of the land first and foremost, that is why treason is such a serious charge. It will face a rebellion if it goes against the culture of the land, against the rulers, who are able to implement a culture against everything being random by precisely controlling the justice system. A slave is a slave because of the justice system, a lower caste is a lower caste because of culture enforced by the justice system.

The culture already saying it is not about performance, no matter how well a slave performs at a task, that is their lot. Relationships in society, legal or cultural refuse that the slave or lower caste be acknowledged, that would go against the reason for relationships based on mysticism, to deny the lower caste anything because it would be a threat to who gets, food, shelter, and clothing first.

The idea around facing trauma in society is to eventually get rid of it. It affects how one gets food, shelter, and clothing, and because it is cultural it will affect their children and grandchildren as it has affected them and their parents. One needs to defy the relationships in society that enforce the idea that relationships are not random. This is dangerous it will affect ones food, shelter, and clothing in many instances ones life.

The relationships will not change unless it is shown that there is a cost to not changing. Besides showing that one is capable, performance, one must demand that their performance be recognized, it is theirs. One demands the performance and capabilities of others be recognized. In this one works with who ever is available knowing that they are going against the culture of the land whose refusal to accept the randomness of things needs to oppress and categorize information such that it is not random when it comes to human interaction. One willing to use trauma for food, shelter and clothing see’s this as their only way, they are not likely to change culturally.

Eventually, understanding that relationships in society are around food, shelter, and clothing, eventually the food, shelter, and clothing of those who are oppressing must be threatened or the actions will not bear fruit and trauma will continue for generations to come this is because those with the power are loathe to let it go because it is easier to take in the relationship and one does not have to give. Threatening the food, shelter, and clothing of those who have relationships in society such that culture favors them getting food, shelter, and clothing is dangerous. It is all about food, thus threatening the food supply is threatening what it is all about that keep’s human beings alive, that determining not only quantity but quality of life.

The end, an individual, a group requires a society that has relationships that allows them to flourish if they have the discipline, without having to do more than others. Their performance must be recognized as their performance. They aim either to change society or break away and create their own society.

Breaking the relationships is not easy, it often requires risking all. This depends on what one values. Does one satisfy the society that does not agree it is about performance, or does one reject it and go with the subtle relationships in society that disagree and require a fairer society. It involves blowing up bridges, food supplies must be threatened. It involves blowing up power lines and power stations, people must also be uncomfortable as they call one vermin for wanting to be just a human being. Are people satisfied with a culture that gives others priority in acquiring food, shelter, and clothing. Then fields must be burnt, pipelines destroyed, ports destroyed, given this day and age, always fixing ports one will become an unreliable exporter. Food shortages never make a happy society.

Society is being changed those are the aims of those who see that the culture does not work in their favor. If it is about mysticism, then the relationships in the movement are about mysticism, to replace mysticism with mysticism.

The aims could be changing how society is structured, removing mysticism and accepting that all relationships are random. It is about today’s needs, about a greater society, for all to contribute. It is not a world solely about poets, and mysticism, it is about those who also see the reality, those who actually do, they are the only ones who have ever uplifted a society materially, it takes patience to invent anything, find a vaccine, train to be a good boxer, grow vegetables, discover anything, run a successful enterprise, for people to eat and improve takes practical people,  those who can’t understand that draw to mysticism something that can be interpreted in a thousand ways, to draw their influence and must fear the doers because they can’t do resulting in a failed revolution before it begins, replacing tyranny with tyranny.

You can see post colonial world where the mystics are ruling in full swing with no constraints, people are not doing too well and governments that love them despise them, they are not allowed to do as looting is the priority.

Once there is fear of abilities tyranny has already arrived and anybody who believes in all relationships are random should immediately abandon that, they are not blowing up bridges to merely replace, but to change structure of society and the culture being around all relationships are random when it comes to acquiring food, shelter, and clothing, the basics of life. The culture favors acknowledgement of deeds by anybody understanding their contribution is a threat to nobody, accepting reality creates a humbler people. The culture acknowledges all relationships are random and any piece of knowledge can come from anybody and that should never be a surprise.

Change is not an easy thing, people despise those they have culturally lowered with no justification except that they lack a gun and cohesion, full cohesion over and above having to blow up bridges, burn fields, ruin ports, damage supply chains, hack the tyrants computer networks, assassinate those that can be assassinated given the tyrant has most of the weapons, it is about the whole package that is society and the vision of a society where all participate, those that will be valued in the future, all or a another bunch of mystics.

Change requires the best of all those involved, ultimate respect for knowledge, the best for the job, it already is extremely risky the undertaking. Everybody wants the other day to be now, but that day comes because of accepting all relationships are random, it’s a risk. The one who bombs can stand upto any bombing expert in terms of know how, the one who gets the information has nerves of steel like none before, the drum player plays the drums like none who have existed before. The intellectual minds stand up to scrutiny and are not afraid knowing that it is about facts the standards are the highest, the assassin is not worthy for daring, the entrepreneur understands what the tastes and needs of their customers are, the scientist makes break throughs, the athlete gives his all, those leading are not competing for adulation at such a time of risk, each individual must contribute to the best they can as each represents the cause. Mysticism should end with those who understand that all relationships are random, a human is just a human take action and demand better of human reality when everybody already knows a human is just a human the reason why needing trauma to control.

The idea is to end excuses for war a just society that everyone can see is just. If we want a just society we must fight those who proudly refuse relationships are random, meaning there can never be a culture of some being inherently superior. Fight the Marxist, fight the Fascist, don’t run from the theocrat, stand with reality your grandchildren will be fucked. The sexist will say boy who want to be girls can compete with girls displacing them, what kind of future is this, smash the ethnic racist liras, raise humanity, raise the human, raise the idea of being, being yourself.  

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

If you like what you read, be generous if you can it will be appreciated

The Golden Rule and Relationships

 

The podcast can be found here: The Golden Rule and Relationships

Gold has been money for a long time, it will because of it’s characteristics remain ready in case of any disturbances to be official money of any society. As good as gold means something of the highest standards. Gold was a trusted form of money because the supply of the money could not be controlled by a single entity. It also fulfilled all the conditions of good money for today and the past ages. The golden rule is supposed to be what gold was to money, a rule of the highest standards and principles.

Gold is a simple concept as money. The golden rule is a simple concept. Do unto others as you would like them to do unto you, a gold standard for a society of equal citizenship, equal class before the law.

Simplicity is not merely accepting the principle behind it all, but also accepting the complexity behind that simplicity. You can not make it simple if you are vague with the complexity behind that simplicity. Those who found this simplicity of the golden rule truly understood society and loved the idea of humanity that they where willing to share it with humanity.

Do unto others as you would have them do unto you may seem a simple concept, but beneath it lies great complexity. Nobody wants to be cheated but people cheat everyday. All this trauma on this planet has a lot to do with the simple fact that people do not like to be cheated themselves, but they cheat others.

That everything is about love has been believed by so many for a very long time. Humans will say that the very universe was created by love, they will say everything is about love. That itself is a simple idea underpinning a great deal in peoples psyche, everything is not and will never be a small thing. When somebody says everything is about love, everything is a great concept, the hugest concept. Philosophy is left to great interpretation sounding great as long as you follow a set of rules of good philosophy.

Though left to great interpretation, as a philosophy, that everything is about love could, probably, give a great discussion around the golden rule.

When one says everything is about relationships, like everything is about love, it is a philosophy and it is left to great interpretations, this is because philosophy is not up to being tested. One might sound fantastic, but it can be left to a great deal of interpretations, because it is philosophy without experimental proof.

In 2016, after experimental observation and experiments being observed and offered around photons, heat, quantum tunneling, double slit experiment where a thing behaves like a particle or a wave, and offering solutions to such dilemmas, after scientific experimentation for the first time the world heard “everything that seems solid to us is made up of particles coming together and having a relationship.” Even better, from a blog post entitled What is a Theory of Everything, same year, same scientist, “Everything is related to something atoms, particles, lions, humans, trees, stars, planets, everything is related to something. It takes energy to have a relationship. All relationships involve a loss of freedom, all relationships take energy to sustain them.”

When particles are in a relationship, when anything is in a relationship, energy sustains that relationship. Then we must question our mind set, how we see things. When we jump up, we come back down. This is due to gravity, that maintains our relationship with this planet. Gravity is part of the energy that is used to maintain a relationship, freedom is lost because of that energy being used to maintain that relationship.

The idea of relationships moved from philosophy to science, and the astute student understood, their ignorance dissolves into science by merely reading those simple statements a lot of it is around the particle, you can’t understand it unless it is from the particle having passed experimental validation. The astute student will understand that this is the solution to science and changes direction towards the particle and what it implies. Of course the astute student could have only come after 2016 in terms of relationships and the particle, the science of relationships, not the philosophy everything is about relationships with no laws, everything is about love with no laws, scientific laws comes from experimentation then one will understand that everything is in a relationship from the smallest particle to largest galaxy, and everything in between, then to show understanding of the concept scientifically they will understand that those relationships need energy to be maintained, resulting in a loss of freedom, you can’t be everywhere, well supposedly theoretically you can if you can those relationships, there you are we learn something new in 2020. Meaning we must ask ourselves what is location? Because location has everything to do with relationships, we are in that particular location because of relationships.

Only a one who forges will not understand to get to everything is in a relationship, it is to accept the vitality of the life, life is part of everything, if life was not part of everything this would be a different universe with different laws that do not allow for life at this time, the particles that would be there are unknown, that is the relationships just before the big bang will have to be different, one has to remember the  idea of the big bang itself is a random event because we know when it happened, why did it not happen earlier, why did it not happen later.

In 2019 we learnt the particle is too big, and with proof from experiments, always from experiments, this time the biggest experiment of them all. Proof given everytime the giant colliders are switched on, everytime particles smash into each other, they don’t become nothing, they become the their basic constituent that makes up every particle, we named this konke. Something in front of everyone but because relationships as a science was knew, nobody looked for the proof of the origin of particles. Particles come from what has been termed konke, they are a result of the relationships of this konke.

A country is about people in a relationship. A country is built by people in a relationship with one another. A society, community are people in a relationship. When considering the golden rule, what types of relationships are we talking about. It is about relationships and energy needed to maintain those relationships. What kind of relationships does the golden rule imply, what kind of losses of freedom does the golden rule imply.

The golden rule, do unto others as you would have them do unto you, means basically the relationships we have should be that I will use my energy in this relationship to treat you as you should treat me. This relationship has to be built on the truth, that is why it is called the golden rule.

The humans primary need is food, food gives the human being energy so that they can be involved in relationships, the immediate needs after food are shelter and clothing. Before we knew about the wonderful tool of money, before we could control the tool that has taken humans from caves to brink of seriously considering settling on other inhabited planets of our solar system,, fire, we needed food, shelter and clothing.  

If you have a piece of meat to eat, you are ready to enjoy it, it’s cooked it’s ready and somebody takes it by force, one will not feel great at all. All human beings know and understand this. Nobody will like this done to them.

Such a relationship in society means it is maintained by the energy of one getting meat, cooking it and it is then taken away. The other uses their energy to take the meat. In this relationship, we all understand that nobody wants to be the one who catches the meat, cooks it, and it is taken away.

This is like when a cheetah out in the wilds of Africa catches an antelope and the lion takes it away. Imagine how those cheetahs feel being cheated like that. Or one can look at the wilds of North America when a few wolves catch an elk but are not enough to stop a grizzly bear from taking away their precious kill. Birds can behave in strange ways. Pelicans in some areas take away fish from a duck’s mouth. They let the ducks do the hunting then swoop down with their bigger size and force the ducks to spit out their fish into their big beaks, literally taking the fish from the duck’s mouth.

But humans have a higher mind, high enough to understand do unto others as you will have them do unto you.

Note the lion is taking an antelope from a cheetah, the lion kills a zebra, the grizzly is taking from the wolves, in other circumstances wolves if they are enough will take from the bear. The pelicans take fish from a duck, but we are humans, it is great folly to compare one human to a cheetah and another to a lion, true humans take from each other but we are not lions and cheetahs, or bears, or pelicans, or eagles, we are humans. It is better that we acknowledge others as humans and understand the relationship one has are with other humans, though similar to wolves and bears, the constant bickering, but our existence is mostly about relationships with other humans, we are not ants, bees, birds, we are human beings.

Human beings can control fire, though rhinos put out fires when ever they can, they can not control fire to benefit from it. Human beings can create extraordinary powerful weapons, take the nuclear bomb. Today there are theoretical possibilities of a quantum bomb, it would be to the nuclear bomb what the nuclear bomb is to TNT. Understanding that there is finer stuff than particles, that finer stuff we have called konke would do the same in terms of power to the quantum bomb what nuclear weapons did to TNT, talking immense energy being released, it is all in our minds.

Understanding that everything is in a relationship and the particle is the center, one way from particle you get this existence that ends up with life, the other way you go to stuff finer than any particle, that is a human. Any human can understand this.

If any human can understand this if they put their minds to it, that means humans are the same in terms of capacity for knowledge. The difference merely being in location because it is at that location where a human gains knowledge, the culture of the location. The golden rule says do unto others as you wish them to do unto you. If one cannot accept the reality that acquiring knowledge is about location, remember “My Fair Lady”, go and watch it. Marcus Garvey had said what My Fair Lady shows in a movie as part of a human movement. If one cannot accept this, then the golden rule can never work. It can never work because the ego will come in the way, one will refuse that they learnt from another they consider as prey.

To accept that knowledge is a random event, understanding and accepting are two different things, to accept it, means one is willing to accept to themselves they have learnt from somebody else. Ayn Rand put this most clearly when she implied in knowledge, even the loser gains, they learn. She put it too much in a competitive manner, the times, she wanted to be accepted at all costs, competition was the thing. To accept you have learnt something is humility, because if you teach somebody and they refuse you taught them and claim it as their own, you yourself would not like it, it is as simple as that.

To accept the golden rule is to accept when somebody does better than you and not be wrecked by envy and jealousy. To accept the golden rule is to reject conspiring against others. Anybody who proclaims that their group is superior will never believe in the golden rule, they believe that others are prey and they should take from them.  

Death is always a great teacher it is in death when we understand that we are all equal. The death itself is not the teacher, but the events leading to that death. Death is always a teacher, you will die, however, in the context of the golden rule, those who are leaving death makes us appreciate the golden rule, why is it there, it is to prevent unnecessary death at it’s very depth. On the battlefield, especially when facing a battle of extermination one must appreciate the role of each and every single warrior, what one is good at and what one is not good at. This is not the time for fantasy, if you are no Rambo but one of information, this is not the time to play Rambo, risk death getting information, the positions of the enemy. This is it, no time for illusions, no time to battle with the ego, do what you do best is the only calling.

It is like that with society too. If at societies greatest peril, that of extermination, each person accepts what they are best suited for, the same principles must apply to the best way a society should survive at peace time. It means the same thing, letting go of ones ego, accepting that your emotions do not mean that you can be at best at what you wish but at what you can actually do. That is the crux of the golden rule. Treat others as you would wanted to be treated. This means first accepting your own limitations.

If you can not accept your limitations with evidence given, your will believe you can bend reality to your will such that it looks like there is no evidence for your limitations. This always leads to harm, this means one must actively eliminate evidence that shows limitations of their abilities. They create an illusion by their incomes that there are better whilst disallowing all evidence to their limitations thus their incomes. They teach these habits to their children how to use illusions, this is what harms the application of the golden rule, desire for unearned recognition.

Unearned recognition is earned by taking it from the one who should have earned that recognition, it happens all the time. Knowing that the claim to that knowledge is unearned, it causes one to despise others, forgetting that life is a random event. One despises others because they know it could be them but they must deny it by creating cultures to protect themselves, if they where so special they wouldn’t need cultures to protect their positions.

The golden rule essentially says let go of those lies that you are somehow superior but that knowledge is a random event determined by attitudes in random locations. If somebody does something better than you don’t be envious, this is the world, humility. Because if we do not accept that humility and we decide to cheat others for our food, this planet will leave up to its namesake, the place of piercing. It surely is called the place of piercing because of the illusions we have set upon ourselves.

Merely accepting somebody is better, means that in this life you must not occupy the sit of those better than you, sitting in unearned positions means your better was harassed, what is it that will stop them doing it to you. Getting unearned food is the cause of the need to break the golden rule. As the food as an unearned they will have to justify it by telling lies that they are somehow special.

When we accept our limitations by evidence provided for us we must take a role within our limitations, that is how a battle against extermination is fought. As one society in peace these principles must continue to apply, ensuring harmony in society. A child will grow up in culture accepting that they take a role according to their personal limitations, they will understand that this not only brings peace to society, but ensures the functioning of that society as one society. When one talks of classes they are talking of different societies that is why different rules apply. Once talking of classes the golden rule can never work because the system is designed to deny by the very fact that there are classes. Different classes different teams. It is only ignorance then that makes people believe in such a system they are all in together.

People are only in it together with those who don’t deny them their abilities, do  not deny them their rightful portion, you can’t be in it together with somebody who is going to rob you.

That is the golden rule, at its basic, human survival is about food, are you humble enough not to rob for your food, those are the relationships that the golden rule aspires us to have. A culture of acceptance of reality, evidence, then we will see everybody as a human and circumstances are circumstances all part of a random process. What is best for societies continuation, it is to accept roles given by evidence of action not philosophy, each taking their rightful role in advancing that society by evidence given, a better product is a better product. That is the golden rule, you can’t be teaching your children to rob other peoples children. Your child must accept that if somebody is better they are better, they will find what they are good at, illusions do not work. To play with illusions one must look down on others thus justifying to themselves robbing them. The golden rule can not work with illusions. It can not work with mysticism, mystics just want to replace mystics, none want reality of randomness, so the tyrant will say they have great priests and geniuses, and the oppressed who also want to be tyrants say they have their own wizards who are the true wizards, and they have own geniuses, genius, priests, magic, all tools of mysticism trying to say another human is somehow better than another.

No works can actually justify the golden rule, a society with relationships that one would call harmonious, at a battle against extinction those relationships must be harmonious, the golden rule must apply or the battle will be lost, great knowledge might be lost as extinction means it is no longer possible to the advancement of the knowledge base. That is a way of taking it, but it is a massive concept, but surely it must all start with food on the table, sustenance.

Once a society starts by cheating others of their rightful sustenance by using non material justifications like race, religion, things like that, who is to know if anybody is truly better than the beggar in the street when so much cheating is taking place. That beggar is alive, so it is not genetic, how did their ancestors survive all these tribulations. By merely being alive means the beggars genetics have been tested in the harshest conditions possible, human relations and all the death associated with it. They are there as a product of a system that disobeys the golden rule, do unto others as you would have them do unto you. There are there because of somebody’s arrogance, generations of arrogance.  

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

If you like what you read, be generous if you can it will be appreciated