Why Bhekuzulu Khumalo and Science?

 As you have guessed my name is Bhekuzulu Khumalo, and you are probably asking yourself why this guy is talking about science. As you will find out, science is more than just discovering, there is a lot of politics that heavily includes nationalism involved in science, science is done by human beings and because people accept this is a field that requires some thought nationalism can run rampant more than in any other discipline. Perhaps this does not fit in with why should I even bother about a podcast on science, given the propaganda about people like myself from the so called elites of the free world, the real rulers of the continued desire for colonial type lies and desire to control all humanity by telling lies about their unique abilities because they can not exist with other human beings, they want to dominate other human beings and have no understanding or desire for the concepts of liberty, freedom, truth and justice. 

What is heat, why is something hot or not hot. How does the sun heat up things? Stand in the shade it is cool, get out of the shade into the sunlight it is warmer or hotter depending on how one uses the English language. But there is a clear degree of changes from one standing in the shade and one standing outside the shade. It is that simple, heat is photons. Only photons have the quality of heat. Temperature is just about how many photons there are in a given area. No need to go into the technicalities about different heat qualities of different waves, but even a cave man knows you go out of the shade it is hotter. Yes, I explained that simple concept that cavemen understood. Looks simple now, but I had to do a little thinking and research.

Yes, I remember, there was so much information we understood, information we understand becomes knowledge. Many sound work around the photon before my arrival on the scene, but whatever, a cavemen knew light creates heat, even when he lit a fire, it is photons not to be too technical. No, the rest is just politics, how can a Khumalo show us reality, we have our publications in the mainstream media that says a black male has the lowest IQ, what can one do, no, they know it is photons, no other particle has the quality of heat, us feeling hot is only a quality we get from photons. An electron, neutrino, quark, magnetism, khumalons, gravitons, these can never give you the quality of feeling hot, only a photon.

Heat is not unique phenomenon, if it was it would be it’s own particle, instead it is just the amount of photons. Heat is a property of the electro magnetic force, in particular photons.

In December 2011 there was an article in Popular magazine of a photo of a photograph of single photons moving.  The experiment seemingly has never been repeated, but one can look it up on youtube, the video is called “Visualizing video at the speed of light — one trillion frames per second” the experiment was done by some MIT guys. It is significant. Okay I will mention their names as if they will ever do such a courtesy, the experiment was done by Andreas Velten and Ramesh Raskar.

What does it mean to take a photo of a photon? It is a massive deal. See when we take a photo, we are capturing photons that are being reflected into the camera lens. These photons are travelling directly into the lens of the camera. Essentially all photos are photos of photons. However, to take a photo of a photon that is not being directed at the camera lens, something special has occurred. It means the photon, to allow us to take a photo is creating itself constantly, otherwise the feat is impossible. Or it is only creating itself because of human interaction, who knows, there is still so much to learn for the Thomas Youngs double slit experiment.

Open your mind. To take a photo of a photon not only means it is replicating itself somehow, but if we could somehow control its direction, make it go in a loop, or make it stationary, replace the camera lens with solar panels, we will have endless energy, can the experiments be repeated, but seeing as we already have evidence, a video, can we not somehow not try and contain photons in an electron field or magnetic field, it goes around in circle and instead of a camera lens we have solar panels. If that video is true and those MIT scientists did that, that is limitless energy.

Now, everything is in a relationship, from the smallest of things, basic particles, or fundamental particles to the largest pieces of information in the universe galaxies, in fact the universe itself is just an independent package of information with many galaxies, stars and planets. All relationships have a cost, that cost is energy.

When one says everything is in a relationship, where did the idea come from. It came from rejecting a philosophy of Einstein when he was confused by the double slit experiment. To get to everything is in a relationship I had to start by looking at knowledge as a commodity and applying scientific principles to the question what is knowledge? To cut a long story short, knowledge is information we know. Now these are problems of languages. I was about to invent a knew word for it because people would take their idea of information and make big arguments for the sake of opposing not thinking, not understanding the question what is knowledge?

After extensive searching about what people think information is I came across the definition that suited what I had found out about knowledge. This understanding of information came originally from a physicist named Wheeler. Everything is information, that falls in line with what knowledge is, information we know. There was then no need to invent a new word. All information has the same characteristics as knowledge, all information is discrete, is independent, is consistent, can be used to compute, and can tell the time.

I thought I would find the idea of information in philosophy from some philosopher, after extensive search I found it from one who does quantum physics. Pretty shocking, he shamed all those philosophers. Knowledge has the same qualities as information because you can only ever know information. It is information because if you look into it, study it it will reveal itself to you. Science is about asking the right questions, understanding what you are asking, as Socrates said, understanding the question is half the answer

Then one realizes all information is made up of the same stuff, basic particles. For these basic particles to form atoms and elements they must come into a relationship. Cutting a long story short, one realizes everything is in a relationship and all relationships result in a loss of freedom There is a loss of freedom because of the energy required to maintain that relationship, there is a cost to a relationship. Einstein never understood this that is why he asked the question if a mouse looks at the moon does it change the universe, yes it does, because the mouse and the moon will be in a different relationship than if the mouse did not look at the moon. 

Everything is part of this universe. Physically speaking when the mouse looks at the moon, it has an active relationship with the moon as a living thing. Photons enter its eyes. Yes that mouse has changed the universe, because if that mouse did not look at the moon, the photons would end up somewhere else, it is that simple, it was too difficult for Einstein to understand, why? because he did not have enough information. When photons are absorbed somewhere else, the universe has been affected, be it a moving ant a mouse or a human.

Believe it or not, where one throws away their litter, say a chocolate wrapping, that changes the universe, merely because that wrapper will have a different relationship with its environment that it litters, and its environment is part of the universe, it doesn’t have to be living. 

John Archibald Wheeler should be considered one of the greatest physicists and minds of the 20^th century for understanding that everything is information and given awards posthumously, he did more for our understanding of the universe than many who have been given awards for physics. If it was not for Wheeler’s ideas I would have given up because there would be nowhere to find that correct definition of information whose properties align with the scientific analysis of knowledge I made, I would have thought I am just crazy and imagining things. But there was a mind whose definition of information aligned itself with knowledge, and because of that we know everything is in a relationship, and all relationships lead to a loss of freedom because of the energy costs involved.

All information is in a relationship and what we have thus far understood it is all made up of the same basic particles. All information packages have the same basic characteristics:

1.       All information is discrete

2.       All information can be isolated. Because it can be isolated that is how we know things and categorize them in the way that is suitable to us. We know that is a tree, a female, a lion, a star, a particle, an electron, a photon, and such.

3.       All information is consistent,

4.       Information packages are independent.

5.       All information packages are random

6.       All information packages can be used to tally, to do arithmetic’s, to compute. You can use an abacus, a tally system, cows, stars, humans, tin cans, or electrons and photons to aide in this.

7.       All information packages can tell the time.

8.       All information packages can be used to measure, how long is something. Half a giraffe, 10 cm, a Planck length, ones foot or hand.

As all information packages have the same basic characteristics and are made up of the same stuff, magnetism must also be discrete, can be isolated, consistent, independent, random, can be used to tally, can be used to tell the time.

To prove this, I had to set up an experiment to determine the nature of magnetism, that coming out of a lodestone, or from a magnet one can purchase at the market. After intensive and exhaustive experimentation, experiments that can be repeated by anybody on this planet.

Magnetism organizes into a wave formation; one can actually see it organize from the data. This was incredible to witness at first. The fact that it organizes into a wave proves two crucial factors about our existence and the nature of this universe. I am saying this universe because I am reluctantly accepting there might be more than one universe because of the randomness of things. But they will not be parallel universes, things and laws of existence will be different. 

These two crucial facts being firstly for magnetism to organize into a wave every time no matter how one interferes with it means it is discrete. Thus, magnetism is just like all other quantum phenomena it is both a wave and a particle, the particle being the quality of being discrete.

The second crucial thing for all the world to see, is that if it organizes into a wave no matter how much one interferes, it must do this as it is the most efficient way to travel, it must be travelling through something, the first real evidence that there is something finer, something more fundamental than basic particles. Earlier scientists speculated about it, and it is true, the ether. Salute to those who just speculated correctly without any experimental proof, great minds indeed.

The evidence out there points that all particles are made up of the same stuff. My first insight was from understanding a little about neutrinos. Interaction of 2 protons can lead to the creation of neutrinos. This means that neutrinos are made up of the same stuff as protons, or should one better state neutrinos are made up of the stuff that makes up protons, quarks. Perhaps not enough evidence. But one can relationships between electrons and protons creating neutrinos. Thus not only are protons made up of the same stuff as quarks, but also electrons. 

Particles that have been categorized or classified depending on the wording one prefers as W bosons that can be both negatively or positively charged decay into other types of particles namely electrons and muons, meaning they are made up of exactly the same stuff.

Magnetism comes from charged particles, charged particles release the quality of what we have categorized as magnetism. That means that magnetism is made up of the same stuff as charged particles, electrons and protons.

I can safely conclude after seeing the behaviour of magnetism that this same stuff is called the ether, everything is made up of this stuff called ether thus it makes us up. Particles are just different relationships the ether is having. I believe that, too much evidence. The only thing that differentiates particles is how much of this ether they have, the mass so to say. The only difference between an electron, a photon, a quark, a neutrino is how much of this ether the particle is made up of.

Anyhow, that is why Bhekuzulu Khumalo, myself can talk about science. The particle of magnetism I named the khumalon after my ancestors, I did discover it and prove its existence because of trying to understand knowledge as a commodity in a scientific mind set. Why should I name it after some other people as if they would name things they discover after my ancestors, humans can be so arrogant?

The experiments I did in quantum physics show that knowledge economics has treated knowledge without any cultural bias, but just as a commodity in scientific principles.

What is knowledge, it is information we know and has the same characteristics as information because we can only ever know information. It is discrete, can be isolated, consistent, independent, random, can be used to tally, and can tell the time. All information is in a relationship even if it is about maintaining itself as that kind of classified information.

When we go to space do we want to destroy other planets, cause environmental disasters like we have done on this planet. Conventional thought of us going to space is that we must mine those planets to get things like oxygen, hydrogen, gold. Thus we mine the moon for oxygen, settlements on mars will need us to mine and extract fuels from Martian rocks. But why? In a white paper I wrote for NASA I pointed out the fact that cosmic rays have all the resources we need and by mere experimentation can provide all the resources we need for existing in space, especially hydrogen and oxygen.

Magnetism controls the direction of this cosmic rays, they are mostly ionized particles, we merely direct them and add electrons to where at our place of our choosing and we get hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen straight from cosmic rays, in the long run much cheaper than mining other planets, and much more environmentally friendly, don’t we ever learn. Cosmic rays offer far more resources than any planet will offer via mining.

There is a real possibility of a nuclear war, it is justified, with human robbing and bullying each other like this. And because of my location I might very well cease to exist, so in part this podcast series is being done as possible last words, well if there is no nuclear war of justice, we shall find other things to do. But if it does occur, if you like the work even if I am gone, just be honest and say where you got the idea. Its for people who enjoy science. It’s just life, everybody wishes to live, and develop themselves to the best they can, but given the situation, anyhow, just enjoy the knowledge I have if you do, our time could have justifiably run out. My ancestors come from what was known as impangezitha, those who accept reality. If I don’t finish and there is a nuclear war, at least you enjoyed, I hope.  We will likely not survive, but those that survive, just remember the golden rule, do not con your mind and believe that people who bring down interviews and replace them with their group are somehow the good guys, they never where, pure evil. I believe our works are in a safe depository, even a justifiable nuclear showdown will not affect them, be nice those that survive. You might enjoy episode 6 if we are still around. 

Thanks, Bhekuzulu Khumalo.

 

If you like what you read, be generous if you can it will be appreciated

Knowledge Economics, Drucker, Culture, Google, Race and Reason in Knowledge

Peter Drucker came of fame and popularized the word knowledge economy. He got his ideas from the likes of Schumpeter, Machlup and others including earlier management gurus like Taylor. What are these people calling knowledge economy?

They say their knowledge economy is a part of human evolution, they are a product of their times when wave theory was a wonderful tool of viewing the world and the future. These wave theories where first categorized intellectually by an economist known as Nikolai Kondratiev. He talked of stages of progress, and the stages have been standardized as agricultural/ pre-industrial, industrial revolution, steam age, mass production, oil power, and age of information and technology. Of these stages, those talking of a knowledge economy are talking of the latter stage, the age of information and technology. They are talking about an economy and the associated industries at a certain stage of human evolution. The term knowledge economics came along, and they have fudged with their definition so much that their definition of knowledge economy doesn’t even correspond with what they are considering.

Knowledge is facts that we have, that has been the definition of knowledge since time immemorial. Knowledge economics merely studies these facts we know that we have commodified, it does not look specifically at a certain stage of human development like those who talk of the knowledge economy. Knowledge economics looks at knowledge and knowledge behaves the same be it pre-industry or after this phase of human evolution.

What does knowledge economy tell us about knowledge the resource itself? The reality is it does not say much, it uses knowledge in mystical ways, because it does not need to truly understand knowledge itself because it is talking about a certain phase of human development. Knowledge economics needs to understand the resource knowledge itself, facts we know, and we know cavemen had facts that they knew, or they would not have been able to get food, it is as simple as that. That we exist means humans in the distant past, in the very beginning had facts that they know, simply to eat you need to know what to eat.

Knowledge economics shows us that knowledge is nothing more than information we know, and thus knowledge behaves exactly like all other information. Knowledge economy doesn’t care about this as it is looking at a phase of human development, like those who study the steam age. Thus, knowledge is discrete as all information is discrete, each piece of knowledge is independent this allows us to be able to learn things. Everything is information, you reading this are as much information as a galaxy, those merely studying the knowledge economy can never grasp this fact because the knowledge economy and knowledge economics are not the same thing no matter how much the crabs try and drag the other crab back into the basket.

Knowledge economics acknowledge that everything is information, it acknowledges that all disciplines can only study information, albeit different aspects of information, thus acknowledging that all disciplines are one, separated only by the aspect of information they are looking into, and the different levels of complexity of that information, only accepting everything is information can we appreciate this fact. What has the concept of knowledge economy to do with that?

Dealing with facts we know and understanding that we only no a part of the whole (this whole, all the information is konke, a Nguni word meaning everything), and knowledge economics deals with that part of everything that we know and commodify, this is economics not just economics of a phase in human development. Everything is just information because everything informs us what it is. Understanding this, knowledge economics can take advantage of the first law of information, that merely states that every relationship involves a loss of freedom, this applies to everything in existence. Knowledge economics takes advantage of this law and allows us to understand the ideological question in socio economics in another way. Quoting from the paper Knowledge Economics: Summary and Rationality, “the ideological side of economics deals with the question, there is a loss of freedom, but there is a benefit, how best do we maximize this benefit whilst minimizing the loss of freedom?” This has nothing to do with a phase in human development, this has to do with looking at facts and commodifying those facts that we know and staying in line with the universal laws of information, universal laws of information that affect the knowledge economy but also pre-industrial society a depth that those studying the knowledge economy do not have to deal with.

As knowledge economics deals with commodified information it cannot escape the reality of the algorithm of information and thus understands the pervasive influence of probability on all information, thus affecting our view of rationality. An action can not be known to be rational except in the future, and all information in existence is restricted in the choices available to it. Even in the freest society there is a limited amount of candy you can choose to buy, the most basic of particles has limited choices, it can not be everywhere, the hydrogen particles in the sun are not here and there at the same time. The wildebeest has limited choices for drinking water.

Tyrants have always wanted to control flow of knowledge, the Popes wanted all knowledge to seem to come from them, thus Galileo’s predicament, colonisers want it to seem that all knowledge comes from them. To control this, they always make it irrational to chase after knowledge if you are not one of them, just as a slave master threatens death if a slave escapes to make it more likely to be irrational to try to escape. The powers that be have determined the world needs not know what a black think, he must merely get answers to the bigger questions of existence from others. It has been made irrational to pursue knowledge, Google, claiming that net neutrality means control of the internet want to control it themselves.

Type knowledge economics and google will always direct you to knowledge economy, even though the two are completely different, the idea is to control black thought, hide it, what right does a black man have to show the existence of laws of information, algorithm of information, stick to what whites have to say about knowledge and economics, no matter how shallow that discipline is. We have to accept this reality, and tell the truth to ourselves no matter what they say the owners of google and other tech companies are out to promote their own, not truth as such, that is why liberty is important, it goes back to that question knowledge economics raises, “how best do we maximize this benefit whilst minimizing the loss of freedom” With liberty the black man will have a way to create their own search engines, encyclopedias on the net, social sites, Artificial Intelligence, mine our own resources, without liberty Blacks are open to the same old lies and being swindled materially, artistically and intellectually, actions always speak loudest, type knowledge economics on google, obviously acting in behest of a larger group otherwise why would google be acting as it does. Anybody who believes in freedom will never behave like this strange  entitled cabal fighting knowledge.

@bhekukhumalo

Am I a Racist

It is a beautiful world, especially if one gets to enjoy themselves here and there. A mind is a tool that one can use for whatever reason they decide to use it for. The idea of some in this world is to say only their minds are capable of doing such wonderful feats as thinking, when we see lions thinking, when we see crocodiles thinking, but they want to deny other humans the ability to think, a futile struggle, but they try, because surely if a deer can think, a human being must be able to think.

Well leave other humans alone, why bother people, decided I will look at knowledge and its relationship with the economy. The first thing one realized was the literature at the time was false, white economists, we must mention their race or the question Am I a racist can not be answered, these white economists had been saying and still insist knowledge is a recent commodity introduced by the rise of the computer. Like it or not the mind has always been the primary tool of man’s survival, the word mind alone implies knowledge, how can anything else be, to know how to get food is knowledge, yet a white will deny this obvious fact and insist knowledge age started with the computer.

What is behind such thinking to deny the obvious, that it is sheer nonsense to claim knowledge age started with computers when the most ancient of humans needed to be know how to get food. Realizing you can never win an argument that has based knowledge on race, I mean Wikipedia became involved in the lies, surely a nigger, ah, to say one is thinking of a man would be wrong, because a man can think, but a nigger can’t a nigger is only worthy as a slave, none thinking. Wikipedia, an institute supposedly claiming to be an institute of knowledge, who on their countless links have examples of humanity using knowledge throughout history would contradict all that evidence they possess to say a nigger can’t think. Because if they considered me a man, a man can think, to them not even a black man, but a nigger, and they kept saying Bhekuzulu Khumalo is wrong, what was it, speedy deletion, something like that, okay fine, it’s okay, knowledge age started with computer age, before that man was surviving on instinct, if that’s what you want a nigger to say to be considered a man, fine, knowledge started in computer age and before humanity survived on instinct like an amoebae, hopefully man enough, accepting the reality that only a white man can think, that is the logic we end up with.

Why would people deny such an obvious fact like it is wrong in every sense of the word wrong to even consider that the knowledge age started with computers, and accept the reality that knowledge has always been the primary weapon of humans, of mammals, they must all know how to get food, let’s take mammals out as these high and mighty are above all, second only to the mythical creations, imagine creating the whole universe and then coming down to earth and bestowing whites only with the ability to think. Obviously, every white believes these creation myths that they alone are bestowed with a mind, a brain that is functional and everything else is below it and can be exploited and ruined.

Why would one say every white believes these myths, millions claim to be atheists, true they might claim to be atheists, but their actions according to their science says only they can think, therefore the religious white and the atheist whites are both racist when it comes to the black man. Those who claim to have scientific minds decided to say for racial reasons that the computer ushered in the knowledge era. For racial reasons, they exposed how far willing they are to go for phoney scientific evidence, the evidence is on Wikipedia for those interested.  This means whites are willing to go to any extent to say fuck you nigger, imagine a computer built by knowledge, then they get first premise wrong and say it is the other way round.

Google behaved in exactly the same manner as Wikipedia, but they will tell you they are for some higher ideals blah blah blah, but when it comes to a black, all their hatred is spewed upon, for no reason that a black can’t think, that fact must be fought with trillions of dollars of resources, what the hell, nobody knew it was a battle, these odds are worse than 300 hundred man fighting thousands upon thousands and coming out alive at the end of the battle. Showed you google long time ago, http://www.blacknews.com/news/knowl_google_bhekuzulu_khumalo101.shtml#.WZExsvmGOM8 their evil only relevant when it attacks white women, when it says they are bimbos.

This argument that a black cannot think from both sides the religious whites and the atheist white that a black cannot think is used to justify their arguments whenever harm happens to a black, anyway its only a back, they can’t think, it’s not as if we have killed a future rocket scientist. And everywhere they promote nonsense showing a black to be a vile and violent creature with no beauty in culture, at the same time saying I am stupid, no, how on earth can I love that.

People are different, but those with Zulu blood, not corrupted by propaganda immediately realize, are these people crazy, lies likes this, what does it mean, this is immense danger, what is the white man hiding, when you tell open lies like this and have them published in leading journals belonging to Harvard, Cambridge, Yale, Princeton, Oxford, and all the other nonsense, what is the game plan? Why is it blacks that espouse this nonsense are known as progressives, how are they promoting progress when they yap their mouths without a thought, never asking is this true.

The idea of course is to say a black man who regurgitates anything a white man espouses as a thinker, so I am presented a Neil DeGraase Tyson as an example of a great great black mind. What has this man done we ask in excitement and anticipation, nothing he married a white woman, what game is the white man playing the Zulu must question, but the same white men will say a computer was the birth of the knowledge age, a computer created by knowledge.

Then a white people will say I am a racist when I warn others defend yourself they are coming, prepare your self, they are coming with illusions and will mock your death, mindless like chimpanzees will be their excuse when they kill. What other reason could there ultimately be.

It’s like somebody saying they believe in trade and then justify colonialism. Well all that gold and minerals you stole you could have traded for them, spears where made of iron, you want the iron we would have sold it to you, the same thinking continues. This desire to always lie about black people. What kind of nonsensical scientist would even dare accept a computer created by knowledge brought the knowledge age when the idea is easily rubbished, a scientist who is very conscious about race.

Well if saying it as it is as racism good, whites are racists saying it as it is not, they both can’t be racism, denying peoples minds is racism because it is saying it as it is not, all evils are built on lies. Whites like turning things around kick you, and when you defend yourself scream you just like us see, it takes two hands to clap, funny people. When they kill other peoples children its funny, when somebody calls for killing of their children they get upset, but they actually have done the deed. 

This is the same attitude whites have taken throughout history, they kill lessor humans and when so called lessor humans point out we love our people too and must defend ourselves whites get all upset, no, black people are important just as much as they are. Kill 100 natives its okay, kill 50 slaves its okay, they kill one back, a small token of resistance and whites say look, these people are evil, no, white opinion is irrelevant, it can deny facts like a computer created by knowledge can not be the dawn of the knowledge age, so they are happily kill 100 slaves, 100 natives and then when one white dies, natives are evil, no, if whites refuse liberty for all, people better defend themselves, in every society the right to bare arms should be there, if the state kills you no matter the excuse, fight it back and kill its agents, if police men, tools of the state are targeting a certain population, they must have the rights to defend themselves from the state, it doesn't matter if they be called savages, evil is wiping you out.

So they sponsor all types of dictators in Africa, whose only job is not to give Africans liberty but to make deals with white business, after all for anybody to be loved by whites they must tell the truth that all knowledge comes from a white, the Africans can be oppressed for their own good and London, Paris and Washington can reap enormous profits, because a black life is worth nothing. A good black is the one who adheres to colonial policy that all blacks are the same. But it is the whites that said they created these countries artificially in such manners so that they could divide and rule the people, the good African is the one who supports keeping these colonial structures so that ironically people can continue to be divided and ruled. All this pulled off by pouring money into the ideology a black can't have original thought, he is but a poodle to be taught, sit, stand, follow, fetch, repeat.

Taking knowledge as it is obviously shows a lot more than most economists would ever see, because knowledge is information we know and information is everything.

I will continue to show the benefits of liberty, free markets, free people for as long as I can with the best my mind has to offer, but in case liberty is rejected people must be ready to defend themselves, and when attacked continuously the concept of the natural right to life must kick in, who is killing who, kill them back wherever possible, you must survive, rejection of liberty is rejection of fairness and justice, those denying liberty have one wish enslavement, if they openly kill you it is to instill fear, fight back, is that being a racist, wow.

Look at my posts, they started changing realizing only going to get fooled, you like algorithms, and correlation, check my posts. I love liberty, I love being free, wiping out my race is wiping me out, it is as simple as that, but otherwise, prefer to be free, we don't want no bossy races, no bossy religions, all these bossy bossy people who do it for only one reason, to control all the money, all the resources. Just a guy traveling through the universe others say they don't want bossy sexes, I don't know, how can a man be bossy when he is protecting his genes, everybody tow the line, but they say bossy sexes. We certainly don't want bossy Presidents and dictators, and kings, want to be a king, go far away in background like Japanese emperor, we give you free booze and meat, otherwise go away. We don't want bossy cops, and any other bossy fellow unless he is paying us, imagine a bossy cop or bossy king, or bossy dictator, or bossy whatever, we are bloody paying you, have some respect, get out of our way. 

Well I believe I have shown in a most methodological way the benefits of understanding knowledge as has been the primary resource of humans. You get to see and understand that nobody knows what the future holds, it really is all just a random even, no matter how close to certainty an event is, it can never be 100% guaranteed, even dropping an egg, it is not 100% guaranteed that it will break even if you throw that egg against a wall and it breaks a trillion times, driving the other day I made a sharp break and a case of eggs fell, not one egg broke, to my shock. Because we don't know where the next great piece of knowledge is coming from, liberty is the most just system, liberty, free trade, free speech, free thoughts, without destroying the society, the natural condition of information is to survive. The aim of an electron is to at least keep its present form, to not be destroyed, it's all information, electron is information, we are information, the law must not privilege anybody too much, race, sex, religion, ethnicity, president, king, soldier, no, nobody. When scientists start privileging each other on other factors besides facts, well, are they scientists or race fighters. 

Bhekuzulu Khumalo