It is through the initial investigation of knowledge as a resource, as the primary resource that led us to eventually know and appreciate that everything is in a relationship. A principle of reality that comes before all principles because all other principles merely describe the relationships.
Whatever
principle one studies, they are looking at or investigating, asking questions
about, looking for the answers for the reason, the answer and the question are
about relationships. Be it gravity, the flu, how to shoot straight, you can
only kill somebody if you have a relationship with them, even if you use a
remote and they are 3 light years away. What ever it is one is looking into,
criminology, the drums or the dance, one is dealing with relationships.
As
everything is in a relationship, this is the principle that explains all other
principles, just as knowledge is the primary resource that gives all other
resources the ability to be resources. To be more scientific in terms of
language, knowledge is the primary resource as it allows one who possesses it
to utilize other information as a resource. Never forgetting that everything is
information because everything will inform you about what it is. Not only that
all information is made up of the same stuff and has the same basic
characteristics, that everything is in a relationship being the most basic
characteristic that everything shares. Knowledge allows us to identify other
stuff, that is made up of the same stuff as us to be a resource, and knowledge
is the only tool that can allow us to do this.
It is
impossible to survive without knowing how to do things. It has always been the
age of knowledge. To look at it otherwise and believe the age of knowledge did
not begin with the first human being, then one can never extrapolate from that
false premise, false principle of knowledge that everything is in a
relationship. We only know that everything is in a relationship because we
accepted that knowledge was the primary resource of the first human being to
survive, the knowledge did not start 100 years ago, 1000 years ago, or even 50
000 years ago, it began with the first human being.
One
should not call something they do not fully comprehend what it means by naming
that thing as such given the precedence set by words for thousands of years. In
every language there is a straightforward translation of the word knowledge, it
is one of the oldest concepts of all humans that exists. You can not then abuse
the word knowledge for sounding mighty knowledgeable, don’t lay politics with
an ancient concept like knowledge that was essential as humans began their
journey.
What
they called knowledge economy, given the history of the concept of knowledge
that has been with every culture, they should
for accuracy of language called it creative economy, but definitely not
knowledge economy, it showed a lack of understanding what knowledge truly is.
Meaning for centuries people did not use their minds until the invention of a
computer, an insult to the concept of knowledge.
When not
trying to be too fancy around the word knowledge and take knowledge for what it
is, something you know, as simple as that. Humans have always known this fact that
is why we have the never-ending politicization of knowledge. Thus they might
claim that the knowledge age began with the computer, humans who built the
pyramids, built Rome, built ancient China, built those remnants we see of 200
000 year old civilizations have always known knowledge can be politicized as it
is the primary resource, a human merely needs to claim to be the source of
knowledge, the source of the primary resource and first claim to food is guaranteed.
Everything is in a relationship, all relationships lead to a loss of freedom
because of the energy needed to maintain them. It is important not to forget that
all relationships are random.
Knowledge
like everything else is about relationships, the type of relationships one has
will determine the type of knowledge they will acquire and use. One has a relationship in a certain location,
in that location it is where they have lost their freedom as they use energy to
maintain relationship or relationships in that location. This means that a
person can only be in one location. One cannot physically be in two or more
places at once.
One is
in one location at any given time and is always in a relationship with that
location. At the very least one is in a relationship with the ground they are
standing on and the air that they are breathing. The location one is in will
determine the relationship that one will have with knowledge. How one views
knowledge, uses knowledge, access to knowledge and cultural expectations around
knowledge.
Access to
knowledge refers to the ease of referencing something, checking up on it, so
that one can know it better or remind themselves of it. That knowledge can come
about from experience or orally, telling one’s child don’t touch that
electrical plug, absolute danger, the reason why so many children are not
electrocuted is because the parent emphasizes absolute danger, from just the
voice with no spanking, you will die my child.
In
todays world most knowledge is transmitted in code, writing is a code, reading
is being able to understand the code, the information is transmitted by
reading. A code that can be stored means that less knowledge needs to be stored
to memory to be accessed. To access this knowledge, one needs to crack the code,
children are taught early to crack the code by learning their A, B, C’s. When
we fully break down these codes and understand even those codes that where not
successful, we will truly understand how humans create codes. The code needs to
be simple.
Access
to knowledge obviously includes access to a teacher. It is a teacher who
commits one’s time in transmitting knowledge, and that is how they get their
food, shelter and clothing. If teachers get paid to give knowledge it means
those who are being taught have somebody paying the bill.
As
knowledge comes in a code and one must learn the code, one needs a teacher. One
can tell a lot about society by who has access to this code, who can read and
write. You will find groupings in society who cannot read and write very well,
the question is why them? What do they have in common? What is their
relationship with government? It cannot be a very good one. You go to countries
and one will find for religious reasons for example females are not allowed
access to the code. It is not a disdain for knowledge, even if it was, why
would they disdain knowledge when knowledge allows one to better themselves. What
in society would force them to have a disdain for knowledge? What in society is
encouraging them or discouraging them? At whose expense are they being
discouraged and encouraged for? What happened in that location such things are
as they are between these subgroups of that society? Obviously answers always
surprise us if we investigate. The answers need an approach with evidence, because
in the depth of poverty somewhere today somebody in this world is struggling
for knowledge, struggling to get the code and utilize the code to get knowledge
hopefully it will end.
By
asking these questions one will likely get a true picture of how that society
truly functions, who has first claim to food, shelter and clothing. It will
tell who values knowledge; which societies give back to each other and that
question will tell you about the relationships these sub groups have internally
because if there is no respect for knowledge in a sub group, they must share
some of the blame, why is knowledge disrespected, how can the worst triumph
over the best no matter the circumstances, why reject the chance to get the
code and apply the code, to reject reading and writing, a negligence of duty by
that sub group.
Knowledge
has always been the primary resource of a human being, that is why throughout
history sectors of humanity have claimed to be the source of that knowledge the
primary resource for all humanity. This has happened in most cultures
throughout history. Claiming to be the source of knowledge others must accord
that sector of society, or humanity a special place, first to food, shelter, and
clothing. To maintain this position culturally trauma must be the primary thus
final weapon. Having said this, knowledge can then not be seen to come from
other sectors of society because they themselves know they are merely playing a
trick, robbing past, present and future. Sad, but that is exactly what that
means, they see other people’s children as servants of their children. A
culture that is afraid of randomness. They are not the only ones afraid of
randomness, nobody wants to do what they don’t want to do, but they must eat. English
Kings in the past didn’t even bother wipe their bums, they had somebody do it. Placed
in power by God. It’s about access to food, shelter and clothing at the end of
the day, not knowledge as such. But knowledge plays a very important role in
getting that food, shelter and clothing.
Culture,
the norms of society affect how a society views knowledge and its uses. At this
moment second decade of the 21st century, it is foolishness to play
down the value of the code and it’s uses, the code being the ability to read
and write even if a picture tells a thousand words. A picture is another method
of knowing things, experiments are easier to explain with pictures, in a way
pictures takes knowledge of any discipline to the people where it belongs, as
easy as possible.
Foolishness
is asking for standards to be dropped because of your lack of respect of
knowledge, knowledge is supposed to be built on knowledge, it is built on past
knowledge, to ask for standards to be reduced means a mind that is already
giving up on knowledge, not understanding its about the discipline in their
location towards knowledge, the respect that society gives to knowledge,
understanding that knowledge is the primary resource, a persons mind is their
primary resource, given that oxygen is for free.
To be
alive is to first have access to food, shelter and clothing. It is best to keep
things at the very basics; it makes it easier to understand whatever is built
upon the basics. It is about food on the table. The quality of that food,
shelter and clothing showing what relationships one has in that location.
Culture
and the organization of society. Who can get this knowledge, initially it is one
who has access to a teacher, having access to a teacher means the knowledge can
be refined, or one will learn how to refine the knowledge, learning ever
greater and more specialized forms of categorization of knowledge, of
information, catering for the diversity of society.
All
progress is from knowledge, from observing our surroundings. That knowledge can
come from inside or outside the society, what matters is that the principle is
true or false. All progress be it in medicine, chemistry, ancient history, how
to organize an entrepreneurial enterprise, how to run a power generating enterprise,
how to farm, how to pour concrete, how to attack in battle, how to defend under
siege and how to accept the results of your observations.
To
accept the principles that underline the reality that progress is about
knowledge, and the advancement of the society in it survival is about progress
that is about knowledge. Growth in the knowledge base means accepting the
results. You can not lose a war and go around saying you won it when your
people are dead and enslaved. This is not dramatic; it is the same as saying an
experiment yielded the desired results in physics when everybody can see that
it did not. You must accept the results of the observation for the knowledge
base to grow.
Times
have been nothing but cultural expectations, these are usually self serving as
society will be organized to fulfill these cultural expectations. Such a group
has been assigned a cultural role, once these cultural expectations are in
place, the idea that knowledge is random is removed. In reality if results go
against cultural expectations that culture in an attempt to survive it’s
contradictions with reality they will attempt to squish that randomness because
culturally they have assigned themselves as the enlightened ones.
Nobody
can tell you what it is to be enlightened, somebody calls themselves enlightened,
or a teacher of those arts will say you are enlightened. Then these same
teachers will say there is always more to learn, always more to know. If there
is always more to know, it is true you are always at the beginning. If one is
always at the beginning how then technically speaking does one become
enlightened when enlightened means you see reality as a whole. But we see
enlightened people refusing the results and thus squish the results. Those who
call themselves enlightened always of course assign themselves roles that give
to themselves, households, and offspring the best food, shelter and clothing, thus
culturally they set themselves in uncompetitive positions, genetically modified
to receive more of a crucial talent like the ability to merely download
knowledge, beyond other human beings who must study, when these are breached
the entire people who depend on this notion that the role they have given
themselves is out of randomness, it is unique, to protect this lie they must
all, all, because they all depend on this fallacy for better choice of food,
shelter and clothing than otherwise, all must aide in hiding random reality
that is outside the cultural norms that they are dispossessed to knowledge more
than other in society, why not all human beings.
All
humans if being honest to themselves should admit some degree of hypocrisy in
their constitution. Hypocrisy can be thought as the result of two phenomena, laziness
being the greater of the two phenomena. The other phenomenon being genuine insincerity.
Even if being insincere, there is always an element of laziness that is why
laziness is the greater of the two phenomena. The biggest hypocrites obviously mix
great insincerity with laziness.
Why
should laziness be considered a part of hypocrisy. The reason is that all
hypocrisy has at its roots somebody not living up to the example they claim to
be. One could not be bothered to live up to what they claim is a standard, they
usually could if they paid attention and wanted to, they couldn’t because they
found it too difficult even if looking like nothing. To tell a child to tidy up
when you are a slob, sure it’s helping the kid but there is not a good example
in front of them. It’s laziness.
Laziness
leads to two things that come quickly to mind. One can invent something to make
the work easier, that is a good thing. It also leads to one being a con artist,
a bad thing. It is the bad laziness that leads to hypocrisy. It all comes down to food on the table, true
all hypocrisy is hypocrisy but now we talk of hypocrisy mixed with intentional insincerity
for the purpose of food, clothing, and shelter.
When a
group calls themselves enlightened, through every medium available to them,
mediums they have to control, they have to control them otherwise such a
message could never be sent. Better still why not genetically engineered to be
enlightened. Why then would they need to make laws and customs to protect
themselves, I am sorry, but if a government can give aid to some or not to
others it means society has been conditioned to accept that as natural. But why
then do these enlightened ones, sometimes genetically inclined to be
enlightened, science, sometimes a right from the skies, religion, every tool is
used given the times, others talk of survival of fittest, Darwin, science, any
tool is used, just to condition society to culturally must have these skills,
thus right to food, shelter and clothing before others forever and ever,
sometimes religion, sometimes science.
Why
then would works not from them be stolen or hidden if they are the masters of
knowledge, they are lazy and insincere, they claim only they can get food in
such and such a way because of either Religion, science, they know they are
telling lies, that is why they have to steal and hide peoples works who do not
fit their criteria but fit the reality of randomness. If they steal the works
of others, it is because they could not accept the results of a random process,
but many will call themselves scientists. Too them it is how is this possible
against all the safeguards we have created to protect our hypocrisy because we
are too lazy to allow it to be a random process, it means we will really have
to be good instead of just stopping others.
Accepting
that knowledge is a random process means accepting the results even if they go
against your desired expectations, if they go against your expectations accept
your place in that area of knowledge. They must look at what is society, if
people are more stupid than you, how is it ever possible to be the same
society, that would be just a convenient lie, having no proof of their
inferiority you have to be a hypocrite who is insincere and lazy to get that
food, shelter and clothing. Giving to your children what does not belong to
them, thoughts that never originated with you but claimed by you through
protecting mysticism you created around yourself. A hypocrite of the first
order.
Knowledge
is about relationships, all relationships are random, as humans have knowledge
as their primary resource, have a right to use their knowledge as inferior as
it might be to make a living understanding that where there is justice facts
speaks for themselves and works are not stolen as the thief should accept the
reality, not good enough instead of stealing food, shelter and clothing from
one who did better for themselves.
Beginning
of cooling things down on this planet is to accept that knowledge is random,
just about relationships, don’t fudge it, you are merely insulting people you
don’t identify with, lessor humans, refusing reality that a mind is just a mind
influenced by location, and location is always random even if you sit on the
rock your ancestors set on 10 000 years ago.
Knowledge
is the primary resource for all human beings, if there is indeed such a thing
as society, society would best benefit if members of the society just accepted
facts for facts, if they can not, it is not a society except at political rallies
because some societies have been cultural rights to have access to knowledge
using mysticism of religion and science. Other societies that are ruled, as
their facts are not facts unless it comes from a ruling class, it can never be
one society where some humans are superior than others, somebody has been set
up to be exploited so that others get their share of food, shelter and
clothing.
Bhekuzulu
Khumalo
If you like what you read, be generous if you can it will be appreciated
No comments:
Post a Comment