Experiment refined from discussion in LinkedIn, to make it more solid and remove doubt.
Experimental evidence points out to everything being made up of the same stuff. When one is talking about everything, they are including particles, all particles are made up of the same stuff. Particles are different relationships of the same stuff. The amount and configuration of this same stuff determines the mass and characteristics of the particle.
This was explained in the paper “The Algorithm of Information and the Origin of Basic Particles”. In the sun a relationship between 2 protons because of the intense conditions we get neutrinos. That means the protons and neutrinos are made up of the same stuff. Also, there can be a relationship between protons and electrons that result in neutrinos. This means protons, electrons, and neutrinos are all made up of the same stuff. This was predicted mathematically.
Like Charles Darwin, one looks for more evidence. One starts with the first principle that everything is in a relationship and all relationships need energy to maintain leading to a loss of freedom and structure. Particles are different relationships of the same stuff, this is clear in particle colliders like at CERN. When neutrons collide into each other a myriad of particles come out of the collision, they must all be made up of the same stuff.
What is a magnet, does it defy everything else out there in existence, it should be made up of the same stuff as the source? This is the primary reason for the experiment. However, the experiment goes further than answer is everything in a relationship, it suggests the magnet is the same as everything else, a discrete phenomenon, nothing is continuous except in pure mathematics.
The experiment has a control, the control is in the illustration below.
We induce a magnetic field and measure it at points A and B. We also manage the electric current that is being used to induce the magnetic field, that is why there is a current meter. This is done so we can have an accurate experiment as possible, this is merely the control experiment. The experiment must use the same amount of current to induce the magnetic field. This is so that we can learn as much as possible with least expense.
The experiment itself is identical to the control experiment except that everything happens in a vacuum using the same amount of current to induce the magnetic field. The mere presence of the magnetic field now means that the magnetic field has to be made up of the same stuff as where it emanates from. The same stuff that makes up the proton, neutrons, and electrons that encompass the material that can induce an artificial magnetic field due to a current being induced. The magnetic field is a result of the current affecting the atoms of this material to release something that can only be made of the same stuff as them, unless there is some unknown phenomenon out there.
Just like what is happening in the sun, proton to proton relationships can lead to neutrinos as well as proton electron relationships can lead to neutrinos. It is either protons, electrons and neutrinos are made up of the same stuff and in right conditions we get neutrinos, just like in right conditions we get a magnetic field when we induce an electric current. The protons, electrons, and neutrinos are made up of the same stuff unless we are willing to pretend there is some boogey thing out there we do not know. Nothing is coming from another dimension. Neutrinos and the magnetic field are not coming from other dimensions.
The difference between the neutrino and the magnetic field is that the source of energy that creates the relationships that end up in an artificial magnetic field is not enough for the magnetic field to break free from its source. Neutrinos break of from their source. We can say any phenomenon we find that does not have enough energy to break from its source as some type of magnetic force.
The experiment is illustrated below.
The strength of the magnetic field at A and B should be equal or more than control experiment because of the lack of interference. There should be different levels of the magnetic field at A and B, different amounts of the same thing that creates the magnetic field, we will call this discrete phenomenon a khumson.
Bhekuzulu Khumalo
If you like what you read, be generous if you can it will be appreciated
No comments:
Post a Comment