Quantum Magnetism Experiment: Everything is in a Relationship and the Khumson

Experiment refined from discussion in LinkedIn, to make it more solid and remove doubt.

Experimental evidence points out to everything being made up of the same stuff. When one is talking about everything, they are including particles, all particles are made up of the same stuff. Particles are different relationships of the same stuff. The amount and configuration of this same stuff determines the mass and characteristics of the particle.

This was explained in the paper “The Algorithm of Information and the Origin of Basic Particles”. In the sun a relationship between 2 protons because of the intense conditions we get neutrinos. That means the protons and neutrinos are made up of the same stuff. Also, there can be a relationship between protons and electrons that result in neutrinos. This means protons, electrons, and neutrinos are all made up of the same stuff. This was predicted mathematically. 

Like Charles Darwin, one looks for more evidence. One starts with the first principle that everything is in a relationship and all relationships need energy to maintain leading to a loss of freedom and structure. Particles are different relationships of the same stuff, this is clear in particle colliders like at CERN. When neutrons collide into each other a myriad of particles come out of the collision, they must all be made up of the same stuff.

What is a magnet, does it defy everything else out there in existence, it should be made up of the same stuff as the source? This is the primary reason for the experiment. However, the experiment goes further than answer is everything in a relationship, it suggests the magnet is the same as everything else, a discrete phenomenon, nothing is continuous except in pure mathematics.

The experiment has a control, the control is in the illustration below.

 

We induce a magnetic field and measure it at points A and B. We also manage the electric current that is being used to induce the magnetic field, that is why there is a current meter. This is done so we can have an accurate experiment as possible, this is merely the control experiment. The experiment must use the same amount of current to induce the magnetic field. This is so that we can learn as much as possible with least expense.

The experiment itself is identical to the control experiment except that everything happens in a vacuum using the same amount of current to induce the magnetic field. The mere presence of the magnetic field now means that the magnetic field has to be made up of the same stuff as where it emanates from. The same stuff that makes up the proton, neutrons, and electrons that encompass the material that can induce an artificial magnetic field due to a current being induced. The magnetic field is a result of the current affecting the atoms of this material to release something that can only be made of the same stuff as them, unless there is some unknown phenomenon out there.

Just like what is happening in the sun, proton to proton relationships can lead to neutrinos as well as proton electron relationships can lead to neutrinos. It is either protons, electrons and neutrinos are made up of the same stuff and in right conditions we get neutrinos, just like in right conditions we get a magnetic field when we induce an electric current. The protons, electrons, and neutrinos are made up of the same stuff unless we are willing to pretend there is some boogey thing out there we do not know. Nothing is coming from another dimension. Neutrinos and the magnetic field are not coming from other dimensions. 

The difference between the neutrino and the magnetic field is that the source of energy that creates the relationships that end up in an artificial magnetic field is not enough for the magnetic field to break free from its source. Neutrinos break of from their source. We can say any phenomenon we find that does not have enough energy to break from its source as some type of magnetic force.

The experiment is illustrated below.

The strength of the magnetic field at A and B should be equal or more than control experiment because of the lack of interference. There should be different levels of the magnetic field at A and B, different amounts of the same thing that creates the magnetic field, we will call this discrete phenomenon a khumson.

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

 

 

If you like what you read, be generous if you can it will be appreciated

What is a Theory of Everything?

 A theory of everything must explain all phenomenon and how everything relates to each other. By its definition, that it is about everything it can not be reduced to only explaining phenomenon in one discipline. This article argues that understanding information will lead us to a theory of everything.

Is it possible to understand to explain all phenomenon? All phenomenon is not just particles, atoms, and physics, all phenomenon must include the housefly, human beings, otherwise it can never be a theory of everything. Everything is everything, you can not limit it. The wonders of the internet is that information is not far away, going to dictionary.com, the definition of everything is “everything or particular of an aggregate or total; all.”  Given this definition, can any concept fulfill this role or is the concept to big.

A theory of everything must explain what is common to everything, if it does not then we are giving a grand title to a concept that is misleading because it does not explain everything. What is everything? How do we know something, how do we know a thing? We know a thing because we have investigated it, or simply because we have by some means come into contact with it. How do we come into contact with this thing, we could be walking and we bump into it, a different kind of soil, a different kind of shrub or plant? Without even investigating we have bumped into something new.

We therefore know things because they essentially tell us what they are, a red stone tells us it is different from the white stones, it does not even have to speak, but it tells us it is different. Even with the familiar, when we get into our living rooms, we know that is a television, that is a chair, that is a fridge, that is food inside the fridge, everything tells us what it is, everything informs us of what it is, everything is information. Everything is information because everything informs us of its nature and characteristics even at the most basic level. Everything is therefore information, a theory of everything must deal with this concept of information, it must speak the language of information.

For philosophy’s sake, philosophers like to argue which is good, it improves our arguments, but one could argue that information is a human construct, that information comes from the thing, and not the thing from information, after all the stars and galaxies existed long before humans came into existence. This seems like a valid argument at first but completely falls apart because the fact is that those very laws of existence, the very laws that created the sun billions of years ago deemed fit to create human beings a few hundred thousand years ago. That means if human beings did not exist right now, the laws of the universe would be different, if life did not exist the laws of the universe would be very different because the fact that life and human beings have evolved in the galaxy means that the laws deemed that if such and such happens, billions of years later you will get life. Human beings can not ever be taken out of the equation because it would be a totally different universe, it might not have gravity, or the electromagnetic spectrum.

Life and humans are part and parcel of everything, you can not have a theory of everything without including life, then it is not the theory of everything but something else. That thing one talks of is merely information to a human being and to a large extent of life. A snake knows it must catch a mouse, it does not do it by instinct it hunts mice and rats. Therefore, a snake itself everything is merely information, it knows it can eat this and it can not eat that. This idea that only humans can think is a Western idea coming from the believe that only humans have a soul and this idea has been culturally placed into science, figure that out. Grizzly bears understand the patterns of their surroundings, they know when the salmon is coming, they have learnt how to hunt. Even crocodiles who are not taught how to hunt understand they must eat what is living, they don’t eat rocks by instinct.

We are humans, we are what could be considered an advanced life form built on the same structure of life as plants, genes. To a human, that thing is information, it informs us of its nature, the sun informs us it is a star, not a planet, a gnat or a television. A human being informs us that this is a human being, not a star, or leopard, or a galaxy. Everything is information, everything informs us about itself in many ways besides physical nature, location, speed, these are all part of information, differentiating information, even when it seems similar, for example no two electrons are the same, they occupy two different locations, just as no two humans or viruses are the same. You cannot study something and pretend you are not there, you will by principle miss the whole picture.

To say you want to study something as if humans don’t exist, why not study something as if nothing exists, the laws of the universe still operate in a vacuum, if you pour matter into a vacuum it will behave according to the laws, so at the end of the day one can say even the information is not important, the thing is not important, only the laws are, but the thing is there, the humans are there.

What is Common to all Information

A theory of everything must unite what is familiar to everything, what is familiar to information. A core similarity of information is that all information comes in packages from the smallest piece of information, the most basic of particles, to the largest information packages in the universe, galaxies, and everything in-between. That includes stars, planets, humans, asteroids, viruses.

All information is discrete, that means a thing is a whole, dividing it would mean it is no longer that thing but something else.

How do we know a thing is a thing? We know because information can be isolated. Looking at a dinner table, we know that this is a table, this table cloth, that a plate, and these utensils. There is a galaxy, it can be isolated to individual solar systems, to planets, to the elements that are the composition of those planets. The elements can be isolated to atomic structure, that can be isolated to sub atomic particles. Thus a galaxy can be isolated from the galaxy itself to the sub atomic particles.

As information is discrete and can be isolated, this is what allows us to learn. If information could not be isolated, how could it ever be possible to learn, we would not be able to tell the difference between a table and the utensils. We would not be able to learn this is iron and this is gold, all information would be just a continuous muddle. Luckily this is not the way things are, otherwise learning would be impossible, one would have to know everything or nothing at all. That is why we need to be careful of those who want to take the human out of the picture and say what if, there is no what if, they have never asked themselves how do they know what they know, as if televisions occur in nature without human beings, it’s because information can be isolated and with the isolation exploited. Things can be isolated from other things.

People do not learn in the same manner, one can learn addition first up to 10 + 10 = 20, or one could learn addition first up to 5 + 5 = 10, and then learn subtraction, 5 – 3 = 2. This points to another crucial factor of information, all information is independent, it exists because of the laws of the universe, a thing is because it has been deemed to be so by the laws of the universe, because of its nature. This allows discoveries to be made by taking different paths, there is no set path, what is important is that information is extracted, this extracted information becomes an individuals or societies knowledge base.

If this quality of a thing being what it is was not true, this quality of independence, all societies would have to behave in the same manner to progress, every society would continuously have to reinvent the wheel to progress, this is obviously not so. 

A not so obvious feature of information is that all information can be used to compute. I first learnt of this whilst listening to a discussion on youtube entitled “The Physics of Information: From Entanglement to Black Holes” featuring four Western scientists Leonard Susskind, Sir Anthony Leggett, Christopher Fuchs, Seth Lloyd, and Bob McDonald, a good video out of many that agree that information is everything.

Everything can be used to compute, you can use an abacus, you can use galaxies, you can use cows, pastoral societies in Southern Africa, Shepherd learnt to count by counting cows, whilst ancient far East people used an abacus, today we use electrons in microchips, but you can use bottles of beers even though it will be might tedious. If life did not exist would it be possible to use everything for computing, in that sterile world, what is going to find it necessary to compute, but life exists, you can never wish it away, it will end when the laws of the universe say it is time to end because of whatever factors that shall arise, but the factors that arise can not break any laws of information.

Relationships and Information

How is it that information can be isolated, what is it being isolated from? Information when talking in the physical sense is isolated from other information, it is isolated from a relationship. Everything is related to something, atoms, particles, lions, humans, trees, stars, planets, everything is related to something. It takes energy to have a relationship. All relationships involve a loss of freedom; all relationships take energy to sustain them. Can we truly put down a physical law, that is the law, all relationships take energy to maintain? How else can one possibly put this?

The first law of information, the first law of everything is that every relationship has a loss of freedom. We can put it at it’s most crude as every relationship has a cost.

It is how we think, if we think as things being separated it will be difficult to see, accepting this simple reality, that all relationships are a commitment therefore involve a loss of freedom and take energy our whole perspective changes. This affects all information, and information in reality will be found in a relation with other information. All elements involve the relationship between electrons, protons and neutrons. It takes energy for this commitment to be maintained, and all the participants, the electron, proton, and neutron have loss of freedom and must give energy for this relationship.

Difficult to comprehend, a man meets a woman in a library, they fall in love and get married, a relationship takes place, both parties must give something to the relationship. This something is in terms of energy. Time that could have been used for another activity is now used to maintain the relationship.

Why are we talking of energy, because energy is what allows things to transform into something else. That same single woman is transformed when she enters a relationship, she is now married. But energy is also what allows things to do things. That single man when he is married in the strictest sense should not have relationships outside that arrangement, relationships that are meant to be between a man and a woman, there are restrictions.

A theory of everything therefore must accept the fact that all relationships in the universe restrict freedom, any relationship results in an increase in complexity. What is complexity? There really is no clear definition one will find even on the world wide web. We can think of complexity as a package made up of dissimilar information. Thus an atom is more complex than its constituents. The more variables involved, the more complex. Take a human being and a star. A human is far more complex than a sun, a sun is just a big ball of hydrogen, one element. A human on the other hand is a hydro carbon that also needs various minerals like zinc, iron, potassium to survive, a human is highly complex. The earth is far more complex than a star.

The more complex means several relationships between information take place, each stage resulting in more and more energy and less and less stability. A human even in mythological biblical times lived for a mere 800 years, a star can burn for billions of years, it is less complex, a proton which is even less complex will be around for 2 x 10²⁹ years, that is a very very long time, nobody knows how that is calculated.

This ratio of the amount of energy that holds the system together, and there is still energy left for transformation, once we get that, we will understand the universe better as we will know how much energy is used up each time there is a relationship. These ratios have to be there, our best bet is to find them in computer simulations, why? Because everything is information, the ratios should be there, a computer simulates information, once we understand those ratios, even computer simulations will be better as we will purposely put this information in algorithms. This is another idea, needs working.

A theory of everything comes from accepting everything is information and therefore will not come from one discipline, if it only comes from physics, it then negates all other disciplines, if it comes from chemistry, what about biology they are also dealing with understanding information, what about psychology or zoology, they are all dealing with information, it is a comprehensive term, a theory of everything.

Our Everyday Lives

Humans are social animals, we survive and thrive on relationships. It is therefore important to be aware of how relationships work, all relationships are the same. Take a simple metal bar, heat it up, we have a relationship, the excess energy is lost as heat, light and other phenomenon of the electromagnetic spectrum as the two systems combine in this relationship. The electromagnetic spectrum is a fancy word for different types of radiation, light is radiation. What happens when 2 corporations come together in a merger, there is excess energy, people get laid off as the two systems get into a relationship. This in physics is known as the conservation of energy. A system can not deal with more energy than it needs. Having got rid of this energy what is left is energy that binds the system, but there is still more potential for mergers, this potential is the free energy of the system.

When we consider trade deals we need to consider how relationships will be affected, this disregard for how relationships occur has to be a major factor why people are now rejecting trade deals. This is nothing against trade deals but we need to understand things before just jumping in, understanding relationships will allow people to ask, is this relationship beneficial to a large number of the society or only a few, if not, they are immoral, human lives must come down to what is moral or not. But to answer the question is something moral we need to understand the process, and when dealing with humans, or any relationship we must understand information and what is common to all information.

If relationships are not handled properly, we are asking for chaos, we are asking for bloodshed, why should people who are cheated accept the status quo. Society should be such that all can achieve maximum potential in the relationship with each other understanding that we are all human beings. If we had understood 20 years ago that everything is just information, these trade deals would have been less troublesome today than they are, this is a major global problem of our times, haste and lack of knowledge has caused massive social upheavals, giving us demagogues and nationalists everywhere.

We are all dealing with information, all research is about extracting information, be one a sociologist, an engineer, a physicist, a chemist, a vet, an economist, all research is dealing with understanding the relationships between information, no need for anybody to be arrogant towards others, all information basically behaves the same. Knowledge is just information that we know, we probably know less than we think, hopefully we do at least understand a theory of everything can not logically be reduced to one discipline, then it is not a theory of everything, a theory of everything has to encompass all disciplines by its very definition that it is dealing with everything.

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

This was added two weeks after original article on 9 November 2017, it is a comment from Google +, it is worth sharing. 

Suzanne Ngatai

Refering back to the second paragraph of the original discussion statement: are you stating something as simple as when information is identified it therefore categorizes itself by 'being' therefore the cost is also the 'not being' of something else that comes along with this categorization? I could well be completely misunderstanding you. However when discussed in context of the theory of everything which sounds reminiscent of the age when philosophers were the fathers of science then I would have to weigh in that indeterminism would be a philosophically more realistic standpoint to begin with than freedom as freedom denotes in and of itself being 'free of' something, thereby excluding that 'something' from the postulated theory of everything?Of course being late to the discussion and slightly philosophically rusty I may well have missed both your points altogether.

One Humanity Comes from the Mind

Humanity is far from being a harmonious existence, we are all guilty, the oppressed must react against oppression and the only way truly available is to talk of violence, there is no way that state structures can slaughter you and you talk of reform, that is just foolishness as history has proven. The oppressors are fighting to keep their positions and take more if they can, it is like a badly written program.

Joanna Montana who resides in Gainesville, Florida, USA, the guy in the middle of Zimbabwe, India, or China does not know where Florida is, so it is important to say U.S.A, well she made an interesting comment on her facebook page recently, and to quote an interesting piece where she summarised what most people who desire peace on earth are thinking, she wrote “I want to see a Global Justice and Peace Keeping NETWORK that protects human rights and the environment... rather than the system we have now, of sovereign nations going to war and murdering each other, based on the lies and manipulation by & for the GLobal Elite... WHY?? to make THEM more profits!!! That really is ALL it comes down to. We need to change this! Not into a centralized New World Order... but a decentralized network which truly represents ALL people, and other living beings on this Planet. This CAN be done and the time is NOW to start making it happen. We need a GLOBAL Non-Violent Revolution!”

In one way or another this is a desire of people who feel not only that they are human, but that others are also human. I mean we don’t 100% agree with her thought but we agree 100% with the principle behind the thought. Take a simple but gigantic idea like the Bitcoin, why is it important, because it takes power away from an elite and gives it to the people. An elite cannot ever print money and give it to itself and then say it is for everybody’s good. People support gold for the exact same principle that is why so many support the idea of commodity currencies like gold and silver.

The press has evolved considerably over time; we know when falsehoods are being told. We know why people are promoted by the press and why others are suppressed. But with the advancement of technology we can see suppression, we now know for example Tesla was at the forefront of modern physics, but this was suppressed by an elite, because they wanted those who fit their image to look like geniuses, so that they show the world these are the ones fit to rule you.

We know their official history is all a lie to make themselves look like they created this world and that the world only came into existence when they came into existence yet they cannot explain civilizations 50 000 years, 100 000 years, 200 000 years ago because this does not fit into their propaganda.

We ask ourselves where dinosaur bones made out of sulfur because we find that to be most common impurity rather than calcium, yet when scientists say it is possible oil is not from dinosaurs they are shut out because these elites cannot afford to be corrected, a man who can not be corrected is the purest evil, because they are pretending to the world that they are the smartest, have all the answers, what a terrible bunch of people. They need the world divided.

After using the flag waving dumb hillbilly filling the simpleton with hate in order to first to fuel the fool to steal land of others, then to perpetuate hatred, with no use to desert him in debt and misery and with useless jobs as the fool has become too expensive they desert him and create conditions whereby they can move their capital to cheapest labor, where corruption can go unanswered, and they call this bringing freedom to the world. Mind you, that hillbilly deserves it for when it was good he enjoyed lynching the weaker, always in a group, against one innocent, but the rest of the world does not deserve the fascism, the hillbilly was a useful tool in suppressing others, let him have a taste of his own evil for being stupid and a willing tool of evil filled with greed and justifying that greed by hating and accepting the notion that those he is stealing from are not actually human, but the rest of humanity does not deserve this fascism.

But then again who is innocent in this little human drama that has been played for thousands of years. This little drama played at the speck of the milk way galaxy, itself a speck in the universe, what we know probably a speck in something grander, in the grand scheme of things, none of us deserve fascism. Are you really an innocent information package, anyhow who cares we want to break that cycle.

How did we get to this point?  Simpletons give religious reasons for this divide from their scriptures, the most well known of these stories because Christians went on a global murder spree and spread their theology is that from the bible, and that is the only reason why it is the best known of these stories. Their story has massive contradictions. They talk of some gods, sometimes a God, mostly nonsense stuff no sane man could wrap their head around it that is why all these religious people are lunatics. The gods confused man in their languages so that we would quarrel and not unite because united we would challenge the gods, and think of ourselves as gods.

Then later on there was a flood and humanity began again from Noah. If everybody is wiped out and we all started from Noah how come we all speak different languages because the gods confused mankind before the flooding, but since we all started from Noah after the flood why different languages and skin colour, just nonsense for simpletons who are likely to murder if they take that kind of confusion as serious history.

Ask any Jew they tell you Jewishness comes from the women not the men, so the entire old testament is a lie because it tells us it started with Jacob and went to his sons when the reality as we are made to understand right now it was from the mother of the sons.

There are others who talk of evolution, more plausible, but still they use religion and the bible and other religious scripture’s as some sort of beacon, and hence they can’t explain civilizations outside their time frame, their time frame being the scriptures and what they know, they talk of Rome, China, Greece, Persia, and reference humanity according to that, civilization their cities started in say 4 000 BC, because their minds are referencing themselves, they can’t explain civilizations, ruins that are up to 200 000 years old, because though claiming to be scientists, they use the religious scriptures sub consciously as reference points in time. Those ancient foundations of 200 000 years ago was the first civilization, when all humanity was in Africa, it’s fall attempting to tie ends together was when mankind first began to differentiate. We don’t know, 200 000 years is a long, long time ago, speculation friends obviously with a bias because those ruins are where I am from, but they are the oldest ruins known in the world those in Southern Africa.

Humans are just an Information Package                   Everything is information because everything can inform you about what it is and everything is made up of the same stuff, information, particles, we are made up of exactly the same stuff as stars, frogs, volcanoes.  Information packages vary according to complexity and density; a human is more complex than a star. The first law of information, a law of information applies to everything that exists because everything is information, the first law of information basically says that every relationship results in a loss of freedom for the information packages involved in that relationship. In laymen’s talk we could just say every relationship has a cost.

Human beings are just information packages, our relationships mean there is a loss of freedom for all involved, but we also have a relationship with the ecosystem, the ecosystem is itself an information package made up of smaller information, everything is information, but this essay is about mostly our relationship with each other, and here we must understand the human being.

Our Thoughts: Accepting Each Other            What is a thought, it is a well known fact that our thoughts affect our world view. Our thoughts are information; our thoughts are the way our minds are wired. To understand a thought might seem easy, take the dictionary definition of a thought from www.dictionary.com, it defines a thought as “the product of mental activity; that which one thinks:

a body of thought.”

A thought comes from mental activity, this is activity in the brain, the thought process we can say takes place in the mind, this is a general word for what takes place in the brain for thinking, reasoning, mind, brain, not too much of a difference, but to be more grammatically correct we shall say mind. Everything is information, thoughts therefore are information, like all other information they must be embedded, embedded means you can literally hold them, they have substance, theoretically you can literally hold a thought in your hand, it is physical.   

A thought comes from the mind, a thought is a pattern in the mind, this pattern is biological, but we can think of it as a computer, the way 1’s and 0’s are organized, though of course a brain is far more complex, this is just for our simple understanding. Therefore, if you tell somebody there is a god, their 1’s and 0’s will be organized differently from one who believes that there are many god’s, though there will be some similarities, but one who believes there is no god or gods their brain will be wired completely different, the information in the brain will be organized more differently.

Our thoughts affect our behavior, not forgetting that every relationship has a loss of freedom, our thoughts therefore restrict us, our thoughts are information, they are a relationship of information within ourselves. Our thought therefore is information that affects our behavior because we are bound in a relationship with them. It is therefore merely a matter of reprogramming our thoughts to accept each other as human beings, to over come the obvious.

The tool of Possession             The elite of the world have used these differences to create differences among humans for their own profit and gain. But their tools are ancient. Possession is a thought. Do be possessed one must first be susceptible to possession. Possession is made to sound like an evil word, one is possessed by demons, one is possessed by evil. But one is filled with the holy spirit, one is filled with the love of the gods, but the process is the same to be possessed and to be filled, take the word possession is neutral as well as the word filled. Instead of saying possessed, one could easily say one filled by demons, one filled by evil, but we have been programmed to think by a trick of words and giving meaning when the process is exactly the same.

Possession has been used by the elite for millennia, we are filled, they are possessed, a nice neat trick, exquisite. Immediately, the wording, right there, there is the divide, their religion, their beliefs are different, let us rob them of everything. Why would gods need to be so tricky, are they not omnipotent? Therefore possession is a thought, from birth this thought is reinforced because some smart assess thought they alone had discovered how the universe works, it has to be the gods, what else could it be, and it can only be my gods, you are being tricked, when everybody is being tricked. That trick trickles all the way down to what we have today racism, religious lunatics, class structures, sexism in many ways, technology wiping out the arm, unless you remember nuns like Yim Wing-chun the inventor of Wing Chun, the foundation of Bruce Lees stunning magic.

In a way we are all possesses and must be exorcised with thinking saying we are just human, and liberty will allow us all to thrive.

If you want to come to deep deep religious theology, let us assume there are gods, why would they want to limit us, they would understand that information becomes more and more complex, why would they not want us to visit the solar system and understand more, are these real gods, would not the real god want us to fulfill all our potential, why else give it to us. If uniting makes us strong, would that not be what our real god wants, why would he want to limit us, then what is point of our creation, a rock uses all its potential, a star all its potential, an atom all its potential, why not us, we are all just information.

Take the media, propaganda is just a tool of possession. Possessed by careful imaging, one suddenly thinks they are Jason Bourne, a Vampire, imagine thinking you are a vampire, have you completely lost it. If not careful one will think they are not capable even though they know they are not inferior biologically or in any other matter.

Possession leads to mimicking, the first thing one does is mimic their parents, their immediate guardians, it is best to allow positive possession, by positive I mean positive towards the uniting of humanity so that we are stronger.

The Tool of Illusion                 Take the Rainmaker, the original and still most powerful wizard imaginable, they control the elements, a dream of modern scientists, what could possibly possess such a man or woman that they believe with their mind, and a staff they can control the elements.

Today the idea of the rainmaker is seen all over the media, only we can think, our geneses are such and such, we are the descendants of the rainmakers, make the laws benefit us and we will bring the rain. What a cheek. The rainmaker is a product of human settlements, with settlements humans invented agriculture and importantly the growing of plants. Plants needed rain, the rainmaker could have free money as long as he provided the rain. All he had to do was make certain a a certain time of the year he could produce rain, that’s free money, but it usually came at a price, if you couldn’t produce the rain you could lose your life, you can’t just be fornicating and eating for a year and the week we need you, you fail. Imagine telling a king you will produce and you don’t, he will turn the people against you. He is not taking the blame, you said you will produce the rain, where is the rain?

The elite have made themselves out to be the rainmakers, a very clever trick, and with the control of propaganda, the media, their hope to possess people long enough to believe in the illusion. That is why democracies end up with the voice of a strong man, not a fool, because the rainmakers end up unaccountable to anybody with all the bribing of politicians, they just exist for free, drinking wine and champagne everyday with a touch of marijuana and having wild parties, but there is no rain.

Once we destroy the possession, exorcise ourselves of dehumanizing each other in our minds, yes we would have a better world, not saying we shall follow such sound advice of we are threatened by extinction. Remember this is a beautiful truth, there must be war if a group of people feel mistreated, how long do you think you can keep arms away from them,

Bhekuzulu Khumalo