It is human beings that undertake the pursuit of science. It is important to understand this to understand the pitfalls one will meet. It is human endeavours that have taken humans this far in understanding the material existence of which human beings are part of. Not forgetting that human beings are made up of the same things that we seek to understand using scientific principles.
Science requires truth to one self, we must look at the world as it is, otherwise it would be difficult to accept reality, then you will understand why I can talk of science, otherwise if we lie to each other, the questions can’t be answered, and those that find the truth too discomforting, they are not worth your time and especially not worth your trust, they have already politicized the science.
We are speaking English here, a language of global communication, why is that, because the British subjugated a huge portion of this planet, but the same people will tell you it is evil if the world spoke German. That is science, as if speaking English or German or French matters to a black, an Indian, Chinese, Native American, those not white speak English because their ancestors would have died otherwise, to a rational colonized man, there is zero difference between the tyranny of an Englishmen and that of a German, they are equal tyranny, to the colonized equally genocidal in nature. If one does not understand this, they will never understand the politics of science as it is today. This podcast is in English.
Science is done by human beings. All human beings are a product of the relationships they have had in the past. These relationships are mostly formed by culture, and one escapes these cultural traps by getting more knowledge, more knowledge affects relationships in the brain, one’s outlook on the world. But for the most part for cultural reasons people will decide to debate the evidence in front of them, and ask figuratively that tree that has just fallen, could it be that person who cut it, our culture says such a person can not fell down a tree. But they have seen him hold and swing the axe and the tree fall.
Science being done by human beings falls into the realm of human desires and wants. The most basic desire for a human being is the same as all other information packages, energy to sustain oneself, with human beings this comes from food, a human being needs access to food to get this energy.
Human beings or even living things flora and fauna are not unique in this need for “food” in quotes. All things sustain themselves with energy. The sun can be a sun because it has energy that sustains it, suns die when this energy diminishes. Black holes need energy to be, that energy comes from eating stars so to speak. The more stars a black hole eats the fatter it becomes. We very much behave like concepts in physics. Take an atom, it needs so much energy to sustain itself as that type of atom. It needs so much energy, anything more than that and it will cease to be that type of atom, that type of element it thus has to expel that extra energy. When a photon gets mixed up with an atom affecting the electrons, this higher state of energy is not desired and photons are released to compensate for the photons received, the energy received.
Charged particles release magnetism, a khumalon. These magnetic particles are released because the charged particles have too much energy more than is needed to maintain the charge. This behaviour affects flora and fauna, there is so much food you need, after that one will not eat. Even the food we eat, that extra energy that has no use in maintaining us we urinate and defecate it. The demand curve in economics is a direct result of this behaviour, that is why it slopes the way it does at a point even free food will be denied by one who is a recipient of charity.
Everything is in a relationship and all relationships have a cost and that cost is energy. But one does not need more energy than that required to maintain that relationship. For humans, food is the energy source that allows a human being to first and foremost maintain themselves as an information package and, secondly to have relationships that the living can have. All these other relationships also require energy, one needs energy to socialize, get a job, have children, provide for those children, things that the living do and must do for the continuation of society. That energy is a cost.
One gets a job in order to get food, to have access to the energy source. That is a cost, one must spend time at a job, as well as spend time eating that food. Even in a society of hunters and there is no money involved, it takes time to find that food, that is a real cost. It takes energy to get energy. One is spending energy at work in order to hopefully get compensation that is more than the energy spent to get that energy.
Food is thus central to human behaviour, access to energy. It is more central than any religion or belief systems, one can survive without religion, but one does not survive without food. The core of any culture thus is access to food. Everything is therefore based around food, having energy to survive, to maintain oneself as an information package that we have defined and categorised as a human being.
As food is central to all human beings, and how people get food is central to culture, and human beings will adhere to that culture, it is the culture that determines the access of food, access to energy of every single person within those boundaries, within that society. This attitude is a human attitude, science is done by human beings, thus this attitude affects scientists, one must have energy to enter a relationship whereby they gather scientific knowledge, one must eat to be a scientist, one needs food to give them energy.
As there is so much evil in the world, scientists will be just as evil as all other human beings. 1 + 1 = 2, but like all other human beings scientists will only accept that 1 + 1 = 2 from somebody who is culturally and politically accepted to themselves. This comes down to food and protecting the food source. They must deny that 1 + 1 = 2 from somebody they do not want to have food from being a scientist, that food from science must belong to them, they will place psychological doubts of is that 1 + 1 = 2 from that person really real, obviously it is real 1 + 1 = 2 is real no matter who says it or who discovers such an a concept.
The world communicates in English, except to those of European descendant it should not really matter that the world speaks German, English or French. The English speaking world during world war two said it would be evil if the world speaks German instead of English, really, to the colonized natives it would be the same be a black in Africa or an Indian, or somebody from Hong Kong, Iraq, or native Americans speaks in English or German, both equally evil as colonisers in the mind of the natives. To a true native of the colonized there was no good or evil in world war two, both equally oppressive machines. Honestly I don’t believe a black would be in a better position be it the Allies or the Germans won world war two, they equally looked down on the natives of the colonized.
This is important to understand. Because the English not the Germans colonized most of the world, and they took their culture and knowledge to more of the world than the Germans, we accept that Newton discovered Calculus. If it was the Germans that had colonized more of the world it would not be Newton known for discovering Calculus but Leibnitz whose notation we still use today. Both the English and Germans of course overlooked Bhaskari the Indian who actually began the revolution of calculus. That is the politics of science, and as one enters the world of science at this moment, though we are trying to get rid of it, it is about more than being correct, it is about who is controlling the culture, who gets food first. In the English world, no matter the reality they would promote an English as the smartest the evidence be damned, they have to give illusions outside that they had superior arms why we must all bow to them and accept them as the “experts” and the unique by claiming to be the source of knowledge. Such that when ever anybody had a question because of the illusions they would ask an Englishman for the answer and pay them, give them food to be the expert, versus a German. It is all about food.
Take the invention of the telephone. Who ever invented the phone would be a cultural victory and them and their offspring would have some guaranteed access to energy, access to food for sometime. The inventor was Meucci, but the system at the time as it saw Italians as lessor, of course today Italians in the West are taken as part of the greater white population. But at the time they were considered as lessor and Alexander Graham Bell was given the credit, and he and his offspring have had a successful and proven source of energy.
Science is full of politics and if one wants to enter science today, it might be different tomorrow for better or worse but different, but today one must acknowledge the pitfalls of science, it is done by human beings and governments and mainstream media are involved, governments and mainstream media are run by human beings. As they say, when a lie is repeated enough it can be taken as the truth.
We sadly always hear, everyday in mainstream articles about how a most important equation of E = MC2 showing the relationship between energy and mass is always incorrectly attributed to Einstein. People even go as far that Einstein had a hand in the atom bomb.
The reality is that Olinto de Pretto is the one who came up with the ground-breaking realization of E = MC2 whilst observing uranium. His observations would directly lead to the atom bomb as well as to nuclear energy. Einstein probably never saw a slab of uranium in his life.
It is important to know where an idea comes from, those who respect knowledge understand this, that do not taint knowledge with nationalistic desires whilst at the same time calling for world peace. Why do people do this, find a champion and then give them stuff that is not theirs so that others can face the trauma of their thefts. It is for food.
When one says Netwon hid his work on calculus but he actually discovered it not Leibnitz, the gain is that the English intellectual would be seen as superior, which group would you then ask to help you with your physics, well, the English of course Newton saw everything including what he didn’t see to play with peoples minds.
The reality of marginal analysis in economics comes from a French scholar called Dupuit. But it has been attributed to Marshall, everywhere you go in economics they call it the Marshallian demand curve. No, it is Dupuit’s demand curve. But why would people think like this, so that when one desires an economist, they would hire somebody from Cambridge, even though it has not done that much compared to the overall picture, it’s all a ruse for a group to get food.
When one hears that E = MC2 comes from Einstein, they will believe a Jew found such an important equation even though it is false, but a group benefits, my own interview was taken down that I made in 2016 with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation to replaced in 2019 with lee Smolin saying exactly the same thing, except because my interview was take down, the gullible public will actually believe Lee Smolin because he is a Jew thought of it, and I could not possibly have thought of it. This is because of illusions corrected, somebody who respects knowledge would frown down on that because it means time will be spent knowing where a thought came from, it can take over 100 years as in the case of de Pretto and E = MC2. But the distortions are done for food security now, be damned about the revelations of the future.
Take string theory, taking Tesla’s ideas of energy frequency and vibrations a new theory came out, they don’t give him he credit for inspiring them, not part of that group. In fact as we shall hear in later podcasts, all that Tesla missed was everything is in a relationship, he understood the universe at the grand level far better than all the Nobel prize winners in physics thus far.
People understand that it is about a group that is a better way to secure the food source, the source of human energy to be able to have relationships. If my work is given to a Lee Smolin, who will one turn to when it comes to understanding why everything is in a relationship Lee Smolin and his group, not myself and my group even though that is where it comes from. The group as a whole benefits, it is cutting out the competition. But Smolins group would like to say NAZIs most evil, to a black his group is just the same both need to deny people like myself. These are the roots of racism, securing food for a group, just get rid of the competition, just say they are incompetent and have low intelligence and just repeat that over and over, constantly daily even better, hear about Einstein’s equation daily Though there will be competition within the group, they have all agreed to take out a source of competition, making it in their view more likely for their group to have a more secure food source.
Theology operates the same, the other groups are competition for food, just keep them out or limit their options.
Science is done by human beings, for one to go into science they must understand and appreciate the politics of science are the politics of society. ! + 1 = 2 is often not enough, it depends on who 1 + 1 = 2 comes from, to secure that individuals food source and the group has taken out the competition.
The other society is not going to give you money to be innovative or discover, they would rather do that themselves, they will give you money to regurgitate their techniques and be smug with themselves. Disciples are for faith not science where questions need to be asked. Ford will never say BMW or Toyota have better cars, they are playing a zero-sum game, unless the zero-sum game ends, this is how humans are.
I apologize to be the bearer of bad news when science is meant to be exciting, unfortunately for the unimaginative it is not exciting so they must stop those who are naturally inclined to it, and that is not genetic, it is a result of relationships one has had. So the dull professor who worked hard got his or her PHD understanding that is just a career path will steal their students ideas. That dull professor knows that the ultimate pure scientist is to add to knowledge base. Not understanding it is okay to be a good teacher they where not meant to discover anything. One company will steal the ideas of another, that is what industrial espionage is about. Science is filled with crookery for all sorts of reasons. Keep exposing the con artists, remember Galileo suffered for the truth against a similar evil, only the church can think, only a certain group can think, same evil for food. Just taking other people’s blessings and talents and lying to humanity pretending its their blessings and talents.
Always ask yourself why the superior mind needs to rob other minds, lie and cheat for their illusions. Just a band of evil. They know they are not superior that is why they rob other peoples minds.
Having introduced myself, and hopefully one now understands the politics behind science, we can now, having taken politics out but the politics need to be understood for anybody entering science, it is not just about facts. We can now deal with science proper, what is science, that is our next episode. As everything is in a relationship, science must be about relationships.
Bhekuzulu Khumalo
If you like what you read, be generous if you can it will be appreciated
No comments:
Post a Comment