It’s All Information

Source: wikicommons

Information is everything and it’s first law is that every relationship results in a loss of freedom. This loss of freedom is what creates complexity. Everything is information

Information has been confused with many things in the past, but all these concepts are merely to describe information. Sometimes information has been described as mathematics, as logic, and some confuse information with data.

Mathematics is a great tool for describing information and help us understand and make sense of all the relationships involved concerning information. Let us give mathematics the benefit of the doubt, but what has mathematics to do with instantaneous events. We know from mathematics theory and dimensions that at infinite spatial dimensions mathematics is completely useless as all changes happen instantaneously. What can mathematics describe in instantaneous changes, only the change can be known but not the event.

Instantaneous Events.

Instantaneous events, ◊, however as has been explained above are what we can not understand, if I existed in infinite dimensions, it means all information in that dimension has infinite dimensions, and exhibits behavior associated with infinite dimensions. Just as we exist in 3 dimensions and exhibit behavior associated with three dimensions and have the limitations associated with 3-dimensional reality, with the effects from the lower dimensions. Therefore, if we where in a reality with infinite dimensions every action is instantaneous, to get across the world must be instantaneous, that is the reality of the implications of different dimensions.

As it is the reality at such a dimension, it means an instantaneous event, ◊ can take many forms, a discipline in an infinite dimension because all events are at the instantaneous the mathematics there can only deal with instantaneous events that take several forms as everything is happening instantly. Our thinking is not yet at that level because we have no idea what a single instantaneous event looks like.

All spatial dimensions must exist together, right now if there are higher spatial dimensions they exist right now in this reality, but somebody from another dimension can’t come here because they are a higher dimension just as we can’t go into 2-dimensional reality even though it is around us everywhere just as higher dimensions are around us everywhere.

Entanglement?

If Alain Aspects experiments truly fits the data, why would he fudge with data, then right now we have an instantaneous event proven by experimentation. However, there are doubts, but those doubts are unfounded but must be considered. There is still a simpler experiment that can be done, where entanglement and light have a race in a classical way, the fastest on the stop watch is the winner.

Once a race happens between light and entanglement we will then know if we have an instantaneous event, ◊, or not in front of our eyes. Mathematics is no longer useful there all we know is the polarization of the particles must be opposite as they are entangled.

Data

Often data is confused with information, no data is a pattern of information it shows the effect of a relationship. It’s a pattern, that’s all it can be and that is a lot. Here is the definition of data from dictionary.com.

1.       a plural of datum.

2.       (used with a plural verb) individual facts, statistics, or items of information:

These data represent the results of our analyses. Data are entered by terminal for immediate processing by the computer.

3.       (used with a singular verb) a body of facts; information:

Additional data is available from the president of the firm.

Data is facts collected about information, data is a human method of storing information because of understanding of patterns, but data is not information that is everything. Those writing the dictionary.com don’t understand that everything informs us as can be seen from their definition of information.

1.       knowledge communicated or received concerning a particular fact or circumstance; news:

information concerning a crime.

2.       knowledge gained through study, communication, research, instruction, etc.; factual data:

His wealth of general information is amazing.

3.       the act or fact of informing.

4.       an office, station, service, or employee whose function is to provide information to the public:

The ticket seller said to ask information for a timetable.

This definition of information is clearly from people who have not fully researched the concept of information and received the good news from trillions of dollars of research, everything is information because to know anything it must inform you what it is, I inform people what I am, by merely looking at my name you know I must be black and of African descent. By merely looking at me you ill see a black man without me having even said a word to you. You see you read this through a screen, it doesn’t have to even speak. Everything is information. In reality, the act or fact of information is undertaken by everything at every moment, even a mouse is being informed otherwise it would not know what is food and what is not food, in terms of information the human action is no greater than the action of the mouse, just different forms of information with different roles and functions.

That useless rock to information as a whole has a role to play, otherwise that useless rock wouldn’t be there, maybe its role is for you to remove it, but it would never exist if it was not meant to exist, just like humans would not exist if they where not meant to exist.All information trying to keep its form, trying to survive for as long as possible through information, we are eating atoms, and we are atoms, we are information and we eat information to survive.

Data shows these patterns of information, data is more like knowledge, it needs information to exist. 

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

Information, gravity, quantum mechanics

D. Sharon Pruitt

Information is everything. It can be said with great confidence that in the beginning, before protons, electrons, higgs boson, before anything there was information. No scientist worth his reputation would dare argue with this. Watching 4 worthy scientists discussing information you get no doubt about the importance of information. A video worth watching entitled physics of information, the panel consisted of Dr. Chris Fuchs, Dr. Tony Leggett, Dr. Seth Lloyd, and Dr. Leonard Suskind.

Before going of their divergent paths all agree that information is fundamental in understanding the universe. Tiny differences in expressing the same thing leads to what at the end is divergent views. Take for example that Dr. Seth Lloyd believes that basically information is everything and the universe is always computing. Dr Suskind believes information is everything you need to know about a system that you can predict what happens next. This is not different from what Lloyd is saying, in reality it is the same, this little difference leading to deeper divisions as each presented their arguments.

Dr Tony Leggett made a very insightful thought, information has to be about something and it has to be embodied. All information has to be embodied what differs is how it is embodied, it can be embodied in a map for example. Suskind to exception to this statement and pointed out that maps can be different the true relationship between cities of Windsor and Kitchener is out there on the earth. Great point but one feels he is missing question of embodiment, even out there, relationship between Kitchener and Windsor is embodied on the earth. If it is known it is embodied in the mind through the brain cells.

Information is key to understanding and explaining the universe in its most simplest terms. However, there is always some disagreement, take Adrian Ferent in his video Faster than the speed of light he declares that "in the beginning was the graviton." He cannot be far if everything is to make sense when accepting the idea that everything is just information, quantum bits so to say.

On LinkedIn,  a Laurent R Duchesne posted some interesting comments about gravity, incidentally allowing this article to take form as gravity is always a difficult question. He posted a video link entitled On Quantum Gravity and the section he posted was of Andy Parker of the Atlas project revealing his thoughts about gravity. "Why is gravity so weak? One possible explanation is that it is not actually weak, it is just as strong as the other forces but we are missing part of it. Gravity is leaking into the extra dimensions, so when we calculate the strength of gravity we are only seeing the piece in the 3d.

Parker and Ferent are both correct in implying the power of gravity. Parker's insights of course led him to believe that gravity is probably as strong as the other forces but it is leaking into other dimensions. Possibly gravity does not need an extra fourth dimension to make the mathematics look tidier and neater, why can we not look at information, the question of information density, and then see how powerful gravity truly is, and a clue to the simplest and best explanation of information.

Information can be understood as the instructions that finally lead to stable particles in the third dimension. A lot of information goes into creating a stable particle as can be seen in colliders. If we are looking for gravitons in colliders, it must mean we believe that gravity is an information package in every particle, and has no mass.

Information creates particles, then particles become the information. A particle is therefore merely an information package. The same information packages having the same properties. What do we witness in colliders? We witness information packages breaking up revealing yet more information. A mistake that we are all making is believing a particle has information in it, the particle is the information. More complex particles of course themselves having information in them.

The original information is a basic particle containing nothing. Its only information was exist. This basic information for us to feel solid matter must mean this basic information had one command exist and there must have been a strong attraction for us to end up with strings. This attraction force has to be the original gravity. Exist must then be calculated to mean join, be attracted. This information package is then distributed in a random distribution package and we get variance in strings. Incidentally this basic information with just the command exist is the original measurement. Using it as a standard would make all else discrete, therefore if Planck Length is correct it measures and is basic unit of length and makes all other measures discrete, if not, then Planck Length might not be measuring, exist, gravity.

To exist in the 3rd dimension information has to have higher density than to exist in lower dimensions. As a rule we can deduce that the higher the dimension the more dense the information has to be. By information density we mean the amount of information in the package. The higgs boson for example is not information dense enough to exist on its own in the third dimension, its package must be included with other packages to create a larger package to get enough density in the form of larger heavier particles like photons, neutrons, and electrons, need more attraction to survive in 3rd dimension.

Basic information is at the smallest end of one dimensional, the command exist can be considered zero dimensional, the only information occupying the zero dimensional space, it literally takes no space, but it takes space. Existence best means joining with other particles creating one dimensional strings of varying lengths. This variety in length due to different amounts of identical information is what theoretically gives string theory a strength. Different size strings are what gives us variety, variety starts in the 1st dimension. These different lengths represent different instructions.

Thanks to attraction strings banding together create our quantum field, formless matter. What has occurred is that exist is still information but is now competing with other information for. Compete of course is the wrong world, forces in nature do not compete, correct sentence is exist the basic information is now collaborating with other information as survival has been ensured. Gravity is at its strongest in one dimension, the most basic information is most stable at zero dimension, but is not dense enough to become stable at one dimension it must join with other information. Exist and gravity seem and can be considered the same thing. Gravity holds everything together. The original information exist is everything. At the end, every particle is made of different arrangements of this basic information.

String theories gift to understanding this information is that different length of strings are different amounts of basic command exist.

Things become more clear with some thinking. It is easy for example to make the mistake because somehow it makes more sense to believe that information acts on particles, on formless matter to create matter, not realizing matter and formless matter are just information themselves. Enough strings create a 2 dimensional field. The variety increases in 2d, the information becomes more dense, other forces help gravity to keep everything together, these other forces are a result of variety and will themselves help create variety.

It is in the upper spectrum of the 2d field that we have enough information density to create what we consider solid matter. It is correct to talk in terms of spectrum, in 3rd dimension lower end of spectrum is just stable particles and upper end of spectrum is complex matter. In one dimension lower end is the single information, and upper end is the string. Lower end of 2d spectrum is 2 strings upper end is complex formless matter almost having enough information density to become 3d information package, particles. The more complex the information the weaker gravity seems to get. It does not get weaker, it remains holding everything together at the most basic level, it seems to be getting weaker because new forces are arising. It is not that gravity is leaking to a 4th dimension, a 4th dimension must be information more dense than a third dimension and more complex. Gravity is a force originating from the simplest information, it seems weaker and weaker as one goes higher in dimensions because there are other forces complementing it to hold together more complex information packages.

We end up perceiving that these forces like the nuclear force, electromagnetic force as stronger than gravity when in actual fact would not exist without gravity. They are forces of the 3rd dimension, gravity is from much lower dimensions

.

This  information gains variety as a means of an algorithm, if this then that. To make useful sense, at 1 dimension as not a lot of information, the area is however information rich, information has more freedom and is less concentrated as information packages are smaller.

The idea of information density can be tested. Take a an entangled particle, place on in isolation the other in a condition where it has desire to react. What happens, does the particle that is alone behave as if it has reacted as well. What about the other particle, how does it react in reactive conditions when action is taken upon the single particle. There must be a point for the particle in a reactive situation to behave with the system, but entanglement is not broken, just overwhelmed with information.

It is not that the force of geography is weak, it just relatively gets less and less with each dimension. There is gravity when there is no energy, no mass. We could put a mathematical expression but there is no need.

Entanglement is allowed to occur because information for a string must be consistent from top to bottom. Even if a string is stretched to the ends of the universe, information must remain the same at either end, and as such entanglement is instantaneous. Entanglement means the 1 dimensional phenomenon exist with us.  Entanglement has to do with information in relation between two related information packages. Does it concern the destruction of information packages?

It we took 2 entangled particles and smashed one in a collider what happens to the other.  It seems it will survive and entanglement will remain across time according to a recent experiment in Israel.

There are no shortcuts of course in any discipline, we must think long and hard at a discipline. Chris Fuchs for example believes that information is what we know. No, there is a lot more information than what we know, Chris Fuchs is talking about knowledge, though similar knowledge deals with what we know, and anybody who understands this article even if they disagree will understand the paper Point X and the economics of knowledge. Knowledge is information known to humanity in a crude sense.

Some Thoughts

Why this assumption that gravity leaks into a 4th dimension, why not all the other particles. That is taking string theory to epicycles conclusion.  It is agreed the graviton can not have mass. Heavier particles are unstable, it is expected that gravity alone is not enough information to be stable, it must remain as a packet of information basically in one dimension and probably not too stable at 2 dimensions either. No it does not disappear into 4th dimension, like any other unstable particle, pack of information it returns to where it is stable.

What is unstable in this dimension has no chance in 4th dimension. The 4th dimension the information is even more dense than in the third dimension. The 4th dimension has forces we have no clue about that come to the aide of such forces as electromagnetic, and nuclear to stabilize that dimension. In 4th dimension, a force like the electromagnetic force will seem weaker. Gravity will be felt as much weaker in the 4th dimension than it is in the 3rd dimension.

When looking at information what matters is the package, as each piece of information is independent from the other, it exists because information has been ordered in that manner by means of a random distribution. It does not matter what information comes first, all that matters is the final package of information. 

We know from looking at knowledge having given it a unit, that the rate of change decreases the higher the dimensions, meaning it increases the lower the dimension. Approaching zero dimensions rate of change is faster than the the information, instantaneous, way faster than speed light can ever achieve. This instantaneous comes out in entanglement, dealing with free information. Similar to infinite dimension, but in infinite dimensions it is instantaneous concerning velocity of a single information pack, complex information packs.

Information density is key to understanding how information works and how dimensions are separated. They are separated by the density of information. The boundary has area as it can be seen by the fact that unstable particles, information packs return to the second dimension, but for some time they exist in this dimension by the fact that for a brief moment we can measure them. That we have identified the higgs boson is because we have banged at the boundaries of dimensions in the lower end of dimensions

.

It is possible that there are many different particles that are there at the beginning and gravity is just one of them dealing with the coming together, but this is unlikely, it makes more logic for there to be the original information pack we have called exist and somehow coming together creates a better existence, more diverse, maybe the original command is diversify, that would mean that gravity aids in diversity.

Hopefully, we will realize string theory is wonderful up to one dimension, it somehow does not seem to fit anything greater. If adding dimensions somehow solves problems, it does not help with gravity. If gravity is unstable in a 3 dimensional environment, it is impossible for it to survive in 4th dimension. A graviton if ever discovered in colliders like all other unstable information packages returns to where it is most stable, it leaks back to the lower dimensions like all the other unstable particles.  

Some questions from the Web (added 36 hours after first posting) Added because very important and points must be made clear

The question of embodiment.

If information precedes everything in what manner is it embodied - A particle is information, it is a set of instructions and it follows those instructions, information is embodied.

Let us just look at our 3 dimensional existence, a particle precedes everything, better to say particles precede everything. Particles are just information, so information in our 3 dimensional existence precedes everything by the very fact that particles precede everything, embodied information precedes everything. A particle is just an information package.

With modern colliders we have seen that particles can be broken even further when they smash. That information package can therefore be broken up, into smaller packages that are unstable in the 3 dimension, but stable in lower dimensions, in this case the 2 dimensional field. The 2 dimensional field provides stability for information of less complex format, less information dense. This information is bound in 2 dimensional "particles"/ phenomenon, it is embodied.

2 dimensional field coming from 1 dimensional strings, they must be of limited length, information is finite.The information is embodied in the strings and is the strings.

It is correct to say information precedes everything and it is embodied.

What is the information about - well I would guess about existence, from simple existence to very complex existence that can try and study itself as well as its surroundings like mankind. From trillions upon trillions upon trillions of identical information bits, the original command exist, to strings of different lengths to give variety. If all strings are of equal length then there could never be variety. Perhaps it would be better to say equal property rather than length.

no contradiction. It is easy to believe that information is in the particle because of the way it is illustrated like a sphere a particle, surely a sphere has information in it. No the particle is the information.

More complex particles of course themselves having more information in them. I can see what immediately looks like a contradiction, but I am trying to stress the point that particles are just bundles of information like smashing particles together we see the information bundles making up the particle momentarily appear. Maybe would have been more clear by saying more complex particles being larger information packages, larger as information package, the particle, is a set of smaller packages of information, a set of smaller particles.

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

Information and quantum mechanics

When discussing quantum mechanics or the study of particles in general, information is the instructions that give a particle its particular characteristics. Information therefore is a code that gives existence to particles ultimately the universe including us.

Energy the guiding foundation thus far in a science like physics needs to be looked into in consideration of information. Energy is a huge concept that physics adopted. All the changes we see in the universe occur because of energy. Having defined information, the changes in the universe that we see can be equated to the result of information and therefore should rightly be equated with information. Though varied in many ways, every change can be equated to information, to changes in conditions of information, energy therefore can be equated to information.

Energy = f(Information)

But what about E = MC2. Both mass and the speed of light are determined by the intermingling of information. Mass is just many particles lumped together, these particles created by information.But of course E = MC2 has one last great gift to give. When light is equal to zero, c = 0, there is no energy, at one dimension there is no light particles come from a 2 dimensional field and corresponding waves must be 2 dimensional as well. But at one dimension there is still information. Just information about how to create particles. Even then things are happening at a one dimensional level apparently without any force, without any use of energy, entanglement comes to mind, created in 1 D but its effects felt even in 3rd dimension.

I = n + f(E) where:

I = information, n = amount of information without any energy, E = energy.

This gives us a function of energy

E = f(I) - n,             and f(I) > n

Current theory would best take this into account as things get more and more complicated.

Information is a discrete variable, you cannot have half an instruction, there would be total chaos. Perhaps think of a computer, would half a bit make sense, maybe, but you can not have half a particle. DNA is information, what is half a gene. Funny enough information being discreet makes everything else discrete, this is a great thought exercise.

What is happening in colliders. Two packs of information collide, information that goes into hat particle breaks up, enormous amount of information is released, a great deal of energy is released. We then can study this information that has been released. This way we crack the code of existence little by little.

We have information that ultimately determines the size, function, polarization, density of matter that makes up the particle. A lot of information goes into a particle, a lot of other particles that are just information. Somehow, all this information  fits nicely into a particle though at times some information looks too big to fit and make one neat particle.

The information going into the particle is unstable once broken up, it is unstable in this information denser 3rd dimension. It returns to the lower dimensions.

Information density is what creates particles, that is why we can call particles a basic information pack. A particle is created by the right density of information for it to be stable in our 3rd dimensions. By smashing particles we are looking at the most basic information we can reach with our current technology.

We can attempt to explain the big bang around the concept of information. The big bang occurred when information density in an overall system reached such a level that it overwhelmed itself and information broke down. The information rich conditions allowed new particles to be created with information that had just been broken up.

Each unit of information is zero dimensional,the most basic information is to create  bands of like information. It is the only way to make sense. Each band therefore is one dimensional and made up of one dimensional points of like information. One dimension is information rich, information is everywhere. However there is no structure . Bands of information have instructions at such a density of information they should join. The strings band together to create formless matter, this is our field, it is two dimensional. 2 dimensional been more information dense than one dimension, that is more information dense than 0 dimensions.

If we considered these bands strings in one dimension, then in two dimension these bands are joining together, each band with different information. Remember each band , each string is made up of infinite dimensional information that is all the same. Each string carries different information, this banding of strings gives us formless matter. Without string theory thought it would be impossible the jump from 0 dimensions to 2 dimensions. Information has to be sufficient enough to create formless matter and more dense as more and more information comes together. We have movement but no energy. The information is not dense enough to create light, or mass as we sense it.

As 2d fields gets more and more dense there is enough conditions to create a repulsion of the information, this is the big bang. Infinite 2 dimensional waves creating our 1 3rd universe. When dense enough the information can be solid to our hands as the first particles are created. At their most basic levels still having string like behavior until the information density becomes too great. Strings remain in the 3rd dimensions, they are information, just above most basic. Bands of strings create formless matter, as information becomes more complex from mixing, bands getting bigger, we finally end up with a particle. A particle in this way can be thought of as a band of strings, each string having different information. The bigger the band the more instructions, with enough instructions we get particles.

Information density has a crucial role to play . How does information density affect a particle. A particle reacts physically like a particle created at the same time we call this entanglement. At what point does entanglement become too weak to be meaningful. It can only be reduced in strength by information density. This can be tested by redoing Alain Aspects Bell experiment. To make it exciting one particle must pass through particle of different polarization. This is what can be termed a completion test for this experiment made well known in his field. We expect entanglement to remain strong.

What is more interesting is to take 2 particles, place one in an environment it reacts easily, then manipulate the first particle, does the second particle react. The beauty of the logic is entanglement still holds, the particle still reacts instantaneously, but information is more dense countering effects of entanglement on the overall environment of the second particle.

The information of a particle is just that. The information making an electron is such that it desires to be connected to information that has created protons and neutrons. The higher density of information associates the electron, proton and neutron to create a system, what we call elements. The information that goes into creating water is identical to that creating gold. Identical patterns, protons, neutrons, and electrons. The information is the same except for quantity. It is this playing with how much code that gives the universe all its diversity in all the ways that diversity can be applied.

All information is independent and of equal value. Though literally trillions of amounts of information, it is mainly through rearrangement of information, and quantity. All information is of equal value because if just one piece of information was different, it would not be the same existence as the logic must lead back to the creation of the Particle. Everything acts as it does because of information.

Bhekuzulu Khumalo 

Dear Physics and scientific community at large

                                                                   Fffred~commonswiki

Dear Physics community/ science community

Rarely does one find themselves writing a letter. But Letters still mean the seriousness of the past, a somewhat personal means of communication even though the purpose for a letter is same as in ancient times, just the means of conveying the message has changed, technology making stuff less serious as it is more immediate.

There is always basics that must be exhausted, then everything becomes more basic. Would it not be better to exhaust the double slit experiment. There is still so much more we can learn, or unravel if we enjoy mystery games. Science is a sort of detective game, looking for patterns. Exhausting the double slit experiment will mean we can finally peek a little more into the basics of dimensions.

Why the double slit experiment was not exhausted is possibly about the original debates that Albert Einstein had with Neils Bohr. Their big debate was about  quantum mechanics  Is it possible to measure the properties of a particle without disturbing it? Bohr and Einstein wasted time here? Maybe it is not worth attacking something just because one cannot fully comprehend it. To justify his position, Bohr had to go deeper and deeper to counter arguments from Einstein and his supporters that he left exhausting the basic properties that can be learned from the most basic experiment. Winning the argument, Bohr and his supporters had very little time to analyze the subject in a proper manner, instead proving with deeper and deeper experimentation and theorizing.

The need to experiment with 2 slits but one of the slits is half the size of the other slits. There are 2 seriously strong logical expectations from this experiment. A pattern could show that the experimented has yielded a pattern such that the top half we get a particle behavior. At the bottom half we get a pattern behavior. This would mean the wave has a two dimensional property. This would be great news for those seriously taking the questions of dimensions seriously.

However there is the possibility that there is a wave pattern as when the 2 slits are of somewhat equal length. This would mean the wave is 3 dimensional. A quandary for both those looking into dimensions and those concentrating on finding more answers in quantum theory.

There is the other possibility that the pattern would give a particle behavior, not as strong logically but a possibility, who knows how the particle will behave when by just looking everything changes. When saying behave like a particle will mean one the two slits will appear at observation as one and a half slits.

There is the slim possibility that the experiment would yield particle behavior but at observation the patterns created by the 2 slits are identical. What a disaster this possibility would lead to, making fun of those believing they have an idea, giving humanity the awe a caveman had for fire and the moon.

  If it 2 dimensional everything falls more neatly into place. It means scientifically we have experimented and discovered a 2 dimensional phenomenon. Quantum mechanics then would become our first foray into the 2 dimensional universe, into actually observing any answers from any other dimensional phenomenon.

This would mean that mass comes from a 2 dimensional activity. Our existence, particles, would start from a 2 dimensional phenomenon, a phenomenon that has eluded our desire to observe, but we can learn more from activity we can create.

We are looking into the one dimensional world, more like theorizing about this world with string theory. We have the zero dimensional phenomenon, just a point, it takes no space whatsoever, that is information. The basic information that acts as catalyst by being involved with the 2 dimensional wave and formless matter. Obviously we will learn how by continuous investigation.

One must be careful, true we send information everywhere today by say means of photons, the information being discussed is the basic code to create a photon from formless matter, to create the most basic building blocks of matter from  formless matter. This information must be the same everywhere and remain constant. That the information remains constant is helpful in understanding entanglement. The same packet of information can never be different, changing it means immediately there is a correspondence with connected particle such that the law that the packet of information must always be the same. This information moves through a one dimensional connection.

In science we sometimes get stuck by looking at new phenomenon from our experiences, what experience do we have about a phenomenon that seemingly can travel if need be at trillions of times faster than light to deliver that information from one particle to another. It does not travel faster than light. Light is a particle, a photon. particles come from a field or wave. This information package is disturbed at zero dimensions there is no light, it has not been created, even at one or two dimensions in the field itself, there is no light, just information about light and formless matter. How then can we compare a phenomenon that exists where there is no light to light, a phenomenon first and only encountered thus far in the 3 dimensional universe of Einstein, Newton, and Pythagoras and where we exist and where all our experiences come from.

If the experiment with the slits is such that one slit is half the size of the other and we get a pattern such that at the top at observation we get a particle pattern but at the bottom a wave formation, our wave is 2 dimensional. This means our three dimensional world comes from a two dimensional foundation.

1 dimension comes from pure information

2 dimensional from 1 dimensional,

3 dimensional from 2 dimensional.

It will hold that 4 dimensional will come from 3 dimensional, what would that kind of observation have an effect on three dimensional space we exist in.

Information exists in all dimensions. In the second dimension this information creates particles, once particle is created it is three dimensional. A New set of information says this is what happens when basic particles interact in certain manner, we end up with life as well as with rocks, stars, water and everything else that is the world and universe we know, where Einsteins thoughts, Newtons thoughts are most relevant. Each dimension has a different set of information, the higher the dimension the more complex the information. Think about it, formless matter has no information, matter has more information, basic particle, plus how to remain stable, charge of particle, and much more information. Understanding this information must be key.

Understanding this information might help us look at why both Einstein and Bohr are correct. Bohr was looking at far simpler information that Einstein. True experimentation has proven entanglement beyond any shadow of a doubt, but in the three dimensional world a particle is rarely but a particle on its own. True basic package of information is the same, but imagine yourself, as you read this letter very well in you could be a bunch of electrons that are complimentary to electrons light years away. The basic information might remain the same but it is constrained by new information. Electron in you could be bound to a carbon atom whilst those light years away bound to a gold atom. This new information overwhelms the basic package that creates process of entanglement when particle is by itself. The entanglement is still there but has been overwhelmed by new information.

We can verify this information overwhelm by adjusting the Bell Test Experiment as conducted by Alain Aspect. There are two possible methods one can think of off hand, but this information overwhelm needs to be resolved to unite relativity and quantum mechanics.
method 1:- In the Experiment one path of the particles is not interfered with. We are shooting 2 particles. The path of the other particle is flooded with other identical particles with different polarization from filter, they can not pass the filters. The test will show that the particle either gets new information from the other particles or it does not, if it does get new information this information will overwhelm information from other particle interfering with entanglement.
method 2 :- The path of one particle is not interfered with. The other particle must pass through particles it is known to react with whose polarization does not match the filters. Once again if correlation is broken then there is an information overload. Entanglement is still there, but there is interference.

Has the concept of time completely disappeared, no. Though instantaneous the change from wave to particle, without observation we see that there was a time when particle behaved like a wave. Time has not completely disappeared in the quantum world, time has not completely disappeared in 2 dimensional universe.

A theory of everything will therefore have to include information and understanding of this formless matter. Therefore a theory of everything can be basically explained as

Ev = f(I), Ev = everything, I = information

Then we learn of formless matter, fm

Ev = f(I, fm)

The information becomes more and more complex the higher the dimension, d

Ev = f(I, fm, d)

A Theory of everything must include information, formless matter, and dimensions.

Exhausting the double slit theory will allow us to see more of this world. How weird is this world? That in the double slit experiment the particle seems to become 2 and interfere with itself. Without observation is it possible for us to keep the 2 particles separated, some physical or other phenomenon creates this barrier. Separating the 2 particles would mean we have actually created matter, that is a massive step in knowledge growth, a critical breakthrough worthy of a champagne party. It would mean in the future humans will be capable of creating matter all because we decided to take a step back and exhaust what should have been exhausted some time ago, the double slit experiment.

Quantum Physics contributes to Economy

Creating matter, humans sure would have come a long way. What seems to be practical in the near future is industrial applications of quantum theory. Who would have thought 100 years ago that quantum mechanics would be this close to contributing to the economy. How many people have really contributed with new thoughts, maybe 10, perhaps 20,  a multi billion dollar industry is on the verge of happening, if not multi trillion according to D. K Matai founder of quantum innovation labs.

The wise and those societies wanting to stay in the forefront are funding quantum technology, quantum computers, quantum time keepers, it is happening. This would represent a huge jump in technology available to humanity.  Quantum technology is very delicate, the process of entanglement must no be disturbed by being overwhelmed by unnecessary information.

Still the idea of creating matter is fascinating, creating matter from formless matter, not banging things together.

Speculation

What is formless matter, could it be the dark matter. When dark matter mixes with information behavior changes and matter is created. The conditions no longer exist to turn this dark matter to mass but we can create these conditions merely by separating what becomes two electrons. If it is possible to create matter, the basic principles set out in the most basic of principles must be scrutinized thoroughly. Alas likely answer is no, has instrumentation gone so far ahead it detects a 2 dimensional phenomenon. A good guess is that dark matter will be understood best by delving deeper into quantum research. However dark energy might be explained that when we do a double slit experiment with one slit half the size of the other, if we get a full wave pattern, then the wave is three dimensional. Then dark matter could be related to formless matter more than we can speculate at the moment.

Philosophy

Even if scientists do not like it, their works change our outlook on the universe. To some looking for answers science justifies no need for a creator. Others looking for the same answer, they look for the same answer because the question is the same? Where do you come from? Others science justifies their creator, especially the question of conscious and phenomenon at the quantum level. Like it or not, science has huge implications on how non scientists view the world.

Science therefore must be kept sacred, something sacred belongs to the entire human race. To keep it sacred is to keep it at the level it is contributions not politics or other non scientific reasoning.

Economists truly come from a most dismal science, a dismal people to the larger extent. To the larger part they have convinced people, the world of the need for elitism, promoting elitism society starts to hate liberty, the free market, and make people believe that only a selected few have natural rights, intellectual rights to think of such deep and profound issues like dimensions, quantum physics, even if they are stuck and in most cases wrong. This comes from a culture of esoteric reasoning that somehow it just is proper if so and so is better than so and so no never the other way round no matter what. Bohr is not known to the general public yet he outwitted Einstein on so many occasions. They ultimately will end up deciding that the correct answer from science is from the scientist who when the interrogator sticks a finger at them and asks how many fingers do I have up the interrogator expects an answer of 3. This culture defended by this economics of bailouts sips into industry, academia, it's culture it becomes everywhere, culture of entitlement, ultimately entitlement to the correct answer.

Scientists surely believe in the progress of mankind, that any human has the right to study what they desire, explore the universe in their minds if they so desire and show, share what they see after some deep thought that sometimes can be confirmed by experimentation. We understand that knowledge process need not be the same to make a contribution as long as what is presented is knowledge, to understand a law of science the starting point can start from completely different questions that need to be answered. This can easily be understood by reading the paper Point X and the economics of knowledge.

Science can only look at the question and answer, not who poses the question, not who answers the question, but science must look only at the answer, is this a plausible answer or has the mark been completely missed. All answers have to have the same scrutinizing process. In politics  and economics they like flamboyant answers from their cousins.

Anyhow

Time to see what happens with 1.5 slits. Eventually we will learn to create matter itself, or how to manipulate phenomenon to create matter. We will begin fully developing scientific principles applicable to 2 dimensional phenomenon, eventually laws applicable through all dimensions. Ladies and gentlemen, the technological singularity is far away, humanity has so much to learn to fully benefit from the bounties of the universe.

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

If you like what you read, be generous if you can it will be appreciated

Quantum Physics, Double Slit Experiment, and Dimensions

 wikicommons

The double slit experiment in quantum physics reveals much important but unexplained phenomenon about the nature of this universe. The double slit experiment is basic to understanding quantum physics, without understanding this experiment fully it is impossible to fully understand quantum physics because there will be too many large questions left unanswered. Not to understand this experiment at its most basic one will never even comprehend  the marvels of the quantum world, the root of existence as we sense it.

Many thoughts and minds have been used to interpret this phenomenon, and from such we have parallel universes, even holographic universes, if we can endure these explanations we can indulge another thought, mixing things up a little bit more.

Many believe it is too complicated to actually understand why at times what is considered a particle behaves like a wave at times and a solid particle at other times. Terry Rudolph, a professor from Imperial College London mentioned some very interesting revelations about simplicity in a lecture he gave that was recorded on 29 October 2014 and uploaded on YouTube. The video is entitled Quantum Theory: it's unreal.

Rudolph showed a complicated slide of how to explain the movements of planets when taking the earth as the center of the solar system. The picture one gets is a complicated illustration of twirling circles, known as epicycles. But when the truth reveals itself it is much more simpler. When taking the sun as the center of the solar system everything else makes sense and a whole new science develops on the correct path.

Rudolph also kick started of the presentation with a good question what would a banana fundamentally be with human beings. The immediate answer to most would be a banana is a banana anyway in the universe because it's atomic structure must remain the same across all existence. However one thinking in a quantum manner would have to say no consciousness plays a crucial part in the world around us. A banana at the end of it all is just a conscious construction that happens to be there because human beings exist. At the end of the lecture no new thoughts are given though a question raised, quantum physics is stuck at further explanations to the double slit experiment and implications.

Usually subjects/ disciplines miss a key principle that they have skirted around, but extremely important principle that is needed to change the thought patterns. In a subject like economics that key principle is morals. In quantum physics is understanding what the slits can demonstrate if indeed they can demonstrate more.

It must have been mind blowing to the early pioneers in the subject of understanding quantum physics, man like Niels Bohr, when they realized what a large part human interference plays with particles, the simple act of observing. Because people are too scared to confront this conscious they become too scared, there might be ways around this by thinking broadly.

One can accept that particles can be waves, a conscious act make these waves particles, therefore this wave also carries information of the pattern. Waves before they become particles are simply information plus what should be termed formless matter.

A wave of electrons therefore is simply information concerning those electrons, information is not the particle. The wave contains the most basic information about particles, a manual for creation of a particle. That information becomes a particle. This is far from being far fetched, at the mere point of observation the wave becomes a particle, drop the idea of wave collapsing into a particle, if you accept the wording, the thinking process will block anything new entering the mind. At observation the wave becomes a particle, it does not collapse into a particle.

At point of observation the information in the wave allows matter to form. Obviously the matter is formless without the information on how to take form. One day we will understand where this information came from, but in this information is the DNA of matter, of the very basic particles. Formless matter can not also be the information at the same time. The formless matter only takes form with information. This formless matter can be thought of as a field perhaps, but ordinary people have a very different view of what a field is. We will by the end understand how to determine the dimension of this wave that is information and formless matter.

The puzzle begins when firing a single electron at a time at barrier with 2 slits when the particle without observation passes through a slit it behaves as if it is a wave. It interferes with itself. This means the atom breaks into 2 goes through both slits and interferes with itself. How on earth does a particle break into 2?

The mere conscious decision of observing at the slit particle remains a particle. But with no observation it behaves like a wave until point of observation some distance from the slits. What truly is going on?

At point of observation information gives matter form, it is the very foundation of the material. Without observation information passes through both slits.It is the distribution of the information that allows the particle to seemingly pass through slits. Information like nature seemingly abhors a vacuum of some sorts. Vacuums offer least resistance, to information those 2 slits offered path of least resistance and the interference allows information eventually to be spread over a wider area, in this case the information of a particular basic particle in most cases with this type of experiment an electron. This is why we most likely see the patterns of the universe as they are, information dispersed as widely as possible.

It seems this information is more than just the mere ability to change formless matter into its most basic constituents of matter, it also includes speed, and an exact measurement of location of the particle as well the surrounding resistance.

This can be easily verified by adjusting the double slit experiment. The famous double slit experiment carried two slits of fairly similar proportions. But we can change this and make one slit half the size of the other and see what happens. We would expect a proportional reduction of wave pattern if the wave flowing through is 2 dimensional. By this I mean if one slit is chopped in half, the half where there are 2 slits the pattern will show wave behavior, however where one slit stands alone we would expect particle behavior.

One says proportional change as this is the quantum we expect not too much until an experiment can be done. Being the quantum world, it would not be too shocking to find that the wave is 3 dimensional. If the wave is 3 dimensional it means that even if one slit is half the other, without observation there is a wave pattern. This can only be possible with the idea of true instantaneous behavior, principles underpinning principles of entanglement. In the case of one particle going through the slits above the half slit, it means the information travels down, crosses barrier, comes up whilst the other information stream was moving at nearly the speed of light but they have remained parallel not just in paths but in distance.

This basic information it must be clearly understood just gives structure to formless matter. It allows matter to gain mass so to say, how does formless matter gain mass, it is all contained in the code that allows matter to be created.

Varying the slits will allow us to gain much more knowledge of the behavior of the very smallest constituents of existence besides merely the dimension of the wave. This way progress can still be made without getting stuck on the conscious. It will reveal itself as we gain more and more behavior about quantum matter.

There is equal opportunity before any experiment that the result of dimensions of waves is either 2 of 3 dimensional. The beauty of this experiment is that both answers our knowledge would gain.

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

If you like what you read, be generous if you can it will be appreciated